Responsiveness through the courts

  • P.O. Box 90153, Montesquieu Building

    5000 LE Tilburg

    Netherlands

Organization profile

Organisational unit profile

Highest national courts in a pluralist legal order are not just responsible for the uniformity and the development of national law, they have become responsible for the application of transnational and European law within the national legal system as well. This changes their position from that of a highest court the top of the pyramid of the national judicial organisation into that of, metaphorically speaking, the spider in a seamless web of (trans)national adjudication. How do they adapt to this changing position? In what sense and to what degree are they responsive to their new tasks and responsibilities? And in what sense are they resistant or ineffective as courts of transnational and European law? How could their functioning as such be improved? Research into these questions necessarily presupposes a comparative and interdisciplinary approach. Comparative, since the highest courts from different (European) legal systems can best be assessed from this perspective (how do they do, relatively speaking?). Interdisciplinary, because this involves research of an institutional, legal, and empirical kind (what kind of institutional, legal and empirical characteristics and circumstances are responsible for the differences in performance?).

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics where Responsiveness through the courts is active. These topic labels come from the works of this organisation's members. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

liability Social Sciences
civil court Social Sciences
Law Social Sciences
child protection Social Sciences
climate change Social Sciences
international law Social Sciences
legitimacy Social Sciences
participation Social Sciences

Network Recent external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Research Output 2006 2019

Achilles en de schildpad: Urgenda in cassatie

Loth, M., 6 Apr 2019, In : Aansprakelijkheid, verzekering en schade. 2019, 2, p. 39 - 40 2 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialScientific

De civiele kamer van de Hoge Raad stelt prejudiciele vragen: analyse en suggesties

Loth, M. & Krommendijk, J., 15 Aug 2019, In : Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn Themis. 180, 4, p. 139 - 153 14 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

Het recht om de geschiedenis te verhalen

Loth, M., 30 Aug 2019, Wegen der Vrijheid: liber amicorum voor Willem Witteveen. Elion-Valter, C., van Klink, B. & Taekema, S. (eds.). Den Haag, p. 277 - 285 8 p.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientific

Houdbaar Recht: over de aansprakelijkheid voor historisch onrecht

Loth, M., 15 Aug 2019, Paramaribo: FHR Lim a Po Institute for Social Studies. 67 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBookScientific

Logica of ervaring?

Loth, M., 15 Jun 2019, In : Aansprakelijkheid, verzekering en schade. 15, 3, p. 75-76 2 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialScientific

File

The Civil Court as Risk Regulator

Loth, M., 25 Sep 2019, Fragile Futures and Resiliency: Litigating Climate Change, Judging Under Stress. Resnik, J. (ed.). 2019 ed. Yale Law School, Vol. Global Constitutionalism. p. 59 - 61 3 p.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Open Access
File

Activities 2017 2017

  • 1 Consultancy

Rondetafelgesprek met Tweede Kamercommissie voor Veiligheid en Justitie

P. Vlaardingerbroek (Consultant)
18 May 2017

Activity: Consultancy typesConsultancyScientific

Press / Media

Laat de kerk misbruik echt erkennen

Karlijn van Doorn

29/09/18

1 Media contribution

Press/Media: Expert Comment