Research Output per year
Organization profile
Organisational unit profile
Highest national courts in a pluralist legal order are not just responsible for the uniformity and the development of national law, they have become responsible for the application of transnational and European law within the national legal system as well. This changes their position from that of a highest court the top of the pyramid of the national judicial organisation into that of, metaphorically speaking, the spider in a seamless web of (trans)national adjudication. How do they adapt to this changing position? In what sense and to what degree are they responsive to their new tasks and responsibilities? And in what sense are they resistant or ineffective as courts of transnational and European law? How could their functioning as such be improved? Research into these questions necessarily presupposes a comparative and interdisciplinary approach. Comparative, since the highest courts from different (European) legal systems can best be assessed from this perspective (how do they do, relatively speaking?). Interdisciplinary, because this involves research of an institutional, legal, and empirical kind (what kind of institutional, legal and empirical characteristics and circumstances are responsible for the differences in performance?).
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics where Responsiveness through the courts is active. These topic labels come from the works of this organisation's members. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Network
Recent external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Profiles
Ianika Tzankova
- Tilburg Law School, Department of Private Law - Full Professor
- Tilburg Law School, Responsiveness through the courts
Person: Academic
Research Output
De tanende bescherming van de toga
Loth, M., 12 Mar 2020, In : Rechtstreeks. 2020, 1, p. 11 - 13 3 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Scientific
Achilles en de schildpad: Urgenda in cassatie
Loth, M., 6 Apr 2019, In : Aansprakelijkheid, verzekering en schade. 2019, 2, p. 39 - 40 2 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Scientific
De civiele kamer van de Hoge Raad stelt prejudiciele vragen: Analyse en suggesties
Loth, M. & Krommendijk, J., 15 Aug 2019, In : Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn Themis. 180, 4, p. 139 - 153 15 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific
Digitalisering en vermogensrecht: Preadvies uitgebracht voor de Vereniging voor Burgerlijk Recht 2019
van Schaick, B., Dec 2019, Digitalisering,vermogensrecht, de platformeconomie en grondrechten : Preadviezen 2019, uitgebracht voor de Vereniging voor Burgerlijk Recht. Gerards, J. H. & van Schaick, A. C. (eds.). Zutphen: Uitgeverij Paris, p. 7-92 86 p. (Preadviezen Vereniging voor Burgerlijk Recht).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Scientific
Finality and fallibility in the Indonesian revision system: Forging the middle ground
Kadafi, B., 2019, 430 p.Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis
Open Access
File
Het recht om de geschiedenis te verhalen
Loth, M., 30 Aug 2019, Wegen der vrijheid: Liber amicorum voor Willem Witteveen. Elion-Valter, C., van Klink, B. & Taekema, S. (eds.). Den Haag: Boom juridisch, p. 277 - 285 8 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Scientific
Activities
- 1 Consultancy
Rondetafelgesprek met Tweede Kamercommissie voor Veiligheid en Justitie
P. Vlaardingerbroek (Consultant)18 May 2017
Activity: Consultancy types › Consultancy › Scientific