Maurits Barendrecht

prof.mr.

Tilburg Law School, Perspectives on private law: cooperation and private rule making
Full Professor, Tilburg Law School

Phone+31134662281, +31134662298
EmailJ.M.Barendrecht@tilburguniversity.edu

Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 221, Montesquieu Building, room M 335
5037 DE Tilburg
Netherlands

Research output per year

If you made any changes in Pure these will be visible here soon.

Personal profile

Research interests

Maurits Barendrecht (1956) practiced law at a major Dutch law firm (1982-1997) and is professor of Private Law at Tilburg University since 1992. He studies dispute systems (legal procedures, negotiation processes, ADR, informal dispute mechanisms) from an interdisciplinary perspective. He systematically looks for knowledge from economics, psychology, organisation theory, negotiation theory, and conflict studies that may be integrated with best practices, in order to improve dispute systems so that they serve the interests of the people that rely on them in a better way.

His research takes places within Tisco (Tilburg Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems). He is also academic director of HiiL Innovating Justice, a leading innovation institute for the justice sector in which Tilburg University participates. Here, he assists courts and other justice sector organisations with developing innovative procedures and measuring access to justice. He also consults on strategies based on innovation.

Career

1982-1992 Attorney at law (from 1989 partner) De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek in The Hague (general practice, contract law, intellectual property law, supreme court proceedings) 1993-1997 Adviser De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek (part time) 2005-2009 Member Raad voor de Maatschappelijke Ontwikkeling (Government Advisory Council on Social Infrastructure) (part time) 1993- Professor of private law Tilburg University (law of obligations, civil procedure, Tilburg Law and Economics Centre (Tilec), International Victimology Institute Tilburg (Intervict))

PhD supervision

PhD candidates

I. Giesen (26 januari 2001) Bewijs en aansprakelijkheid

E.J.A.M. van den Akker (9 maart 2001) Beroepsaansprakelijkheid ten opzichte van derden

J.H. Duyvensz (25 april 2003) De redelijkheid van de exoneratieclausule

A. Pinna (27 oktober 2003) The obligations to inform and to advise

W.C.T. Weterings (24 maart 2004) Efficiëntere en effectievere afwikkeling van letselschadeclaims

R.H.J. van Bijnen (24 juni 2005, Cum laude) Economische en sociale normen in het contractenrecht

R.M.P.P. Cascao (28 november 2005) Prevention and Compensation of Treatment Injury

M.W. de Hoon (14 december 2005) Opzegging van duurovereenkomsten

L.R. van Harinxma thoe Slooten (17 maart 2006) Toegang tot het recht in perszaken

S. van Gulijk (17 december 2008) European Architect Law. Towards a New Design

Y.P. Kamminga (17 december 2008) Towards Effective Governance Structures for Contractual Relations. Recommendations from Social Psychology, Economics and Law for Improving Project Performance in Infrastructure Projects

V.C. Ammerlaan (9 januari 2009) Na de ramp: de rol van de overheid bij de (schade)afwikkeling van rampen vanuit een belangenperspectief van de slachtoffers

J. van der Linden (21 mei 2010) De civiele zitting centraal: informeren, afstemmen en schikken

J. van Veenen (15 juni 2011) Getting to :-) The Potential of Online Communication Tools to Support Interest-Based Dispute Resolution

P. Sluijter (31 oktober 2011) Sturen met proceskosten. Wie betaalt de prijs van verstorend procesgedrag?

M.S. (Malini) Laminarayan (19 november 2012), The Heterogeneity of Crime Victims: Variations in Legal Preferences

J.H. Verdonschot

R.J. Dijkstra