A cognitive perspective on scientific realism

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review


    The debate about scientific realism is concerned with the relation between our scientific theories and the world. Scientific realists argue that our best theories or components of those theories correspond to the world. Anti-realists deny such a correspondence. Traditionally, this central issue in the philosophy of science has been approached by focusing on the theories themselves (e.g., by looking at theory change or the underlying experimental context). I propose a relatively unexplored way to approach this old debate. In addition to focusing on the theory, we should focus on the theorizer. More precisely, in order to determine on which component of a theory we should hinge a realist commitment, we should analyze the cognitive processes underlying scientific theorizing. In this paper I do just that. Drawing from recent developments in the cognitive sciences and evolutionary epistemology, I formulate some tentative conclusions. The aim of this paper is not so much to defend a particular position in the debate on scientific realism but to showcase the value of taking a cognitive perspective in the debate.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1157-1178
    JournalPhilosophical Psychology
    Issue number8
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Oct 2019


    Dive into the research topics of 'A cognitive perspective on scientific realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this