A comparison of the health status and psychological distress of partners of patients with a left ventricular assist device versus an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A preliminary study

C.J. Brouwers, K. Caliskan, N. de Jonge, D.A.M.J. Theuns, A. Constantinescu, Quincy-Robyn Young, C. Cannon, J. Denollet, S.S. Pedersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Objective
To examine if the caregiving for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is related to a poorer health status and more distress compared to patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
Background
Partners distress may influence patient outcomes and is therefore an important aspect in the care of LVAD and ICD patients.
Methods
Multi-center prospective observational study with 6 months follow-up of 33 LVAD partners (27% men; mean age = 54 ± 10 years) and 414 ICD partners (22% men; mean age = 60 ± 12 years).
ResultsL
VAD partners reported better physical (F = 10.71, p = .001) but poorer mental health status (F = 14.82, p < .001) and higher depression scores compared to ICD partners (F = 3.68, p = .05) at 6 months follow-up, also in adjusted analyses. There was no significant difference between groups on anxiety.
Conclusion
Caregivers of LVAD patients show higher distress levels compared to caregivers of ICD patients. LVAD partners may have a need for support beyond what is offered currently in clinical practice.Keywords: Left ventricular assist device, LVAD, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD, Health status, Anxiety and depression
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27–32
JournalHeart & Lung
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Heart-Assist Devices
Implantable Defibrillators
Depression
Caregivers
Mental Health

Cite this

Brouwers, C.J. ; Caliskan, K. ; de Jonge, N. ; Theuns, D.A.M.J. ; Constantinescu, A. ; Young, Quincy-Robyn ; Cannon, C. ; Denollet, J. ; Pedersen, S.S. / A comparison of the health status and psychological distress of partners of patients with a left ventricular assist device versus an implantable cardioverter defibrillator : A preliminary study. In: Heart & Lung. 2015 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 27–32.
@article{772f6e5e55e7422cac4aedecfbe80175,
title = "A comparison of the health status and psychological distress of partners of patients with a left ventricular assist device versus an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A preliminary study",
abstract = "ObjectiveTo examine if the caregiving for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is related to a poorer health status and more distress compared to patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).BackgroundPartners distress may influence patient outcomes and is therefore an important aspect in the care of LVAD and ICD patients.MethodsMulti-center prospective observational study with 6 months follow-up of 33 LVAD partners (27{\%} men; mean age = 54 ± 10 years) and 414 ICD partners (22{\%} men; mean age = 60 ± 12 years).ResultsLVAD partners reported better physical (F = 10.71, p = .001) but poorer mental health status (F = 14.82, p < .001) and higher depression scores compared to ICD partners (F = 3.68, p = .05) at 6 months follow-up, also in adjusted analyses. There was no significant difference between groups on anxiety.ConclusionCaregivers of LVAD patients show higher distress levels compared to caregivers of ICD patients. LVAD partners may have a need for support beyond what is offered currently in clinical practice.Keywords: Left ventricular assist device, LVAD, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD, Health status, Anxiety and depression",
author = "C.J. Brouwers and K. Caliskan and {de Jonge}, N. and D.A.M.J. Theuns and A. Constantinescu and Quincy-Robyn Young and C. Cannon and J. Denollet and S.S. Pedersen",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.10.007",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "27–32",
journal = "Heart & Lung",
issn = "0147-9563",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

A comparison of the health status and psychological distress of partners of patients with a left ventricular assist device versus an implantable cardioverter defibrillator : A preliminary study. / Brouwers, C.J.; Caliskan, K.; de Jonge, N.; Theuns, D.A.M.J.; Constantinescu, A.; Young, Quincy-Robyn; Cannon, C.; Denollet, J.; Pedersen, S.S.

In: Heart & Lung, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2015, p. 27–32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the health status and psychological distress of partners of patients with a left ventricular assist device versus an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

T2 - A preliminary study

AU - Brouwers, C.J.

AU - Caliskan, K.

AU - de Jonge, N.

AU - Theuns, D.A.M.J.

AU - Constantinescu, A.

AU - Young, Quincy-Robyn

AU - Cannon, C.

AU - Denollet, J.

AU - Pedersen, S.S.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - ObjectiveTo examine if the caregiving for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is related to a poorer health status and more distress compared to patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).BackgroundPartners distress may influence patient outcomes and is therefore an important aspect in the care of LVAD and ICD patients.MethodsMulti-center prospective observational study with 6 months follow-up of 33 LVAD partners (27% men; mean age = 54 ± 10 years) and 414 ICD partners (22% men; mean age = 60 ± 12 years).ResultsLVAD partners reported better physical (F = 10.71, p = .001) but poorer mental health status (F = 14.82, p < .001) and higher depression scores compared to ICD partners (F = 3.68, p = .05) at 6 months follow-up, also in adjusted analyses. There was no significant difference between groups on anxiety.ConclusionCaregivers of LVAD patients show higher distress levels compared to caregivers of ICD patients. LVAD partners may have a need for support beyond what is offered currently in clinical practice.Keywords: Left ventricular assist device, LVAD, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD, Health status, Anxiety and depression

AB - ObjectiveTo examine if the caregiving for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is related to a poorer health status and more distress compared to patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).BackgroundPartners distress may influence patient outcomes and is therefore an important aspect in the care of LVAD and ICD patients.MethodsMulti-center prospective observational study with 6 months follow-up of 33 LVAD partners (27% men; mean age = 54 ± 10 years) and 414 ICD partners (22% men; mean age = 60 ± 12 years).ResultsLVAD partners reported better physical (F = 10.71, p = .001) but poorer mental health status (F = 14.82, p < .001) and higher depression scores compared to ICD partners (F = 3.68, p = .05) at 6 months follow-up, also in adjusted analyses. There was no significant difference between groups on anxiety.ConclusionCaregivers of LVAD patients show higher distress levels compared to caregivers of ICD patients. LVAD partners may have a need for support beyond what is offered currently in clinical practice.Keywords: Left ventricular assist device, LVAD, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD, Health status, Anxiety and depression

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.10.007

DO - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.10.007

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 27

EP - 32

JO - Heart & Lung

JF - Heart & Lung

SN - 0147-9563

IS - 1

ER -