### Abstract

In their paper Nothing but the Truth Andreas Pietz and Umberto Rivieccio present Exactly True Logic, an interesting variation upon the four-valued logic for first-degree entailment FDE that was given by Belnap and Dunn in the 1970s. Pietz & Rivieccio provide this logic with a Hilbert-style axiomatisation and write that finding a nice sequent calculus for the logic will presumably not be easy. But a sequent calculus can be given and in this paper we will show that a calculus for the Belnap-Dunn logic we have defined earlier can in fact be reused for the purpose of characterising ETL, provided a small alteration is made—initial assignments of signs to the sentences of a sequent to be proved must be different from those used for characterising FDE. While Pietz & Rivieccio define ETL on the language of classical propositional logic we also study its consequence relation on an extension of this language that is functionally complete for the underlying four truth values. On this extension the calculus gets a multiple-tree character—two proof trees may be needed to establish one proof.

Original language | English |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 1-15 |

Number of pages | 15 |

Journal | Journal of philosophical logic |

Publication status | Published - 2015 |

### Keywords

- Belnap-Dunn logic
- Gentzen calculi
- Multiple tree calculi
- Exactly true logic

## Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Gentzen Calculus for Nothing but the Truth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

## Cite this

Wintein, S., & Muskens, R. (2015). A Gentzen Calculus for Nothing but the Truth.

*Journal of philosophical logic*, 1-15. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10992-015-9385-3