A good tennis player does not lose matches. The effects of valence congruency in processing stance-argument pairs.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

According to the principle of Argumentative Orientation (AO), speakers and writers adjust their frame choice to the opinion they want to convey and hearers and readers are sensitive to this profile choice. In three reaction time studies (N = 68; N = 97; N = 60) we investigated whether, in line with AO, stance-argument pairs congruent in valence are easier to process and to verify than incongruent pairs. Second, we tested whether, in line with predictions from
the Markedness Principle (MP), positive congruent pairs are easier to process than negative congruent pairs. In line with AO, participants made faster and more accurate judgments of congruent pairs than of incongruent pairs. This effect was observed when controlling for word length and word frequency, and occurred irrespective of the distance between the evaluative word in the stance and argument. No unambiguous effect of Markedness was found.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPLoS ONE
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Time and motion study
Processing

Keywords

  • valence framing
  • Reaction times
  • argumentative orientation

Cite this

@article{b086a41fb22046f3835f204617fda364,
title = "A good tennis player does not lose matches. The effects of valence congruency in processing stance-argument pairs.",
abstract = "According to the principle of Argumentative Orientation (AO), speakers and writers adjust their frame choice to the opinion they want to convey and hearers and readers are sensitive to this profile choice. In three reaction time studies (N = 68; N = 97; N = 60) we investigated whether, in line with AO, stance-argument pairs congruent in valence are easier to process and to verify than incongruent pairs. Second, we tested whether, in line with predictions fromthe Markedness Principle (MP), positive congruent pairs are easier to process than negative congruent pairs. In line with AO, participants made faster and more accurate judgments of congruent pairs than of incongruent pairs. This effect was observed when controlling for word length and word frequency, and occurred irrespective of the distance between the evaluative word in the stance and argument. No unambiguous effect of Markedness was found.",
keywords = "valence framing, Reaction times, argumentative orientation",
author = "Naomi Kamoen and Maria Mos",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "5",
language = "English",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE",

}

A good tennis player does not lose matches. The effects of valence congruency in processing stance-argument pairs. / Kamoen, Naomi; Mos, Maria.

In: PLoS ONE, 05.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A good tennis player does not lose matches. The effects of valence congruency in processing stance-argument pairs.

AU - Kamoen, Naomi

AU - Mos, Maria

PY - 2019/11/5

Y1 - 2019/11/5

N2 - According to the principle of Argumentative Orientation (AO), speakers and writers adjust their frame choice to the opinion they want to convey and hearers and readers are sensitive to this profile choice. In three reaction time studies (N = 68; N = 97; N = 60) we investigated whether, in line with AO, stance-argument pairs congruent in valence are easier to process and to verify than incongruent pairs. Second, we tested whether, in line with predictions fromthe Markedness Principle (MP), positive congruent pairs are easier to process than negative congruent pairs. In line with AO, participants made faster and more accurate judgments of congruent pairs than of incongruent pairs. This effect was observed when controlling for word length and word frequency, and occurred irrespective of the distance between the evaluative word in the stance and argument. No unambiguous effect of Markedness was found.

AB - According to the principle of Argumentative Orientation (AO), speakers and writers adjust their frame choice to the opinion they want to convey and hearers and readers are sensitive to this profile choice. In three reaction time studies (N = 68; N = 97; N = 60) we investigated whether, in line with AO, stance-argument pairs congruent in valence are easier to process and to verify than incongruent pairs. Second, we tested whether, in line with predictions fromthe Markedness Principle (MP), positive congruent pairs are easier to process than negative congruent pairs. In line with AO, participants made faster and more accurate judgments of congruent pairs than of incongruent pairs. This effect was observed when controlling for word length and word frequency, and occurred irrespective of the distance between the evaluative word in the stance and argument. No unambiguous effect of Markedness was found.

KW - valence framing

KW - Reaction times

KW - argumentative orientation

M3 - Article

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

ER -