A longitudinal study of the effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on objective and perceived corporate performance

C.P.M. Wilderom, P.T. van den Berg, U.J. Wiersma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We investigated the combined effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on perceived and objective company performance using a longitudinal design. Employees (N = 1214) in 46 branches of a large Dutch bank rated branch management on charismatic leadership, organizational culture in terms of work practices, as well as perceived organizational performance. Objective performance data were collected twice, two years apart. The split sample technique attenuated common source bias. Results of structural equation modeling, in which Time 1 financial performance measures were controlled, revealed that charisma increased financial performance; however culture did not do so. Culture and charisma were significantly related to perceived performance, and culture and charisma were interrelated. A longer time interval may be necessary before the effects of culture on financial performance become apparent. The findings are discussed against the backdrop of the value of intangible resources.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)835-848
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Organizational Culture
organizational culture
longitudinal study
leadership
charisma
performance
Organizational culture
Longitudinal study
Corporate performance
Charismatic leadership
bank
Financial performance
Charisma
employee
trend
management
resources

Cite this

@article{9f36d3bbd23e49c499a7e8b2db0c76bd,
title = "A longitudinal study of the effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on objective and perceived corporate performance",
abstract = "We investigated the combined effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on perceived and objective company performance using a longitudinal design. Employees (N = 1214) in 46 branches of a large Dutch bank rated branch management on charismatic leadership, organizational culture in terms of work practices, as well as perceived organizational performance. Objective performance data were collected twice, two years apart. The split sample technique attenuated common source bias. Results of structural equation modeling, in which Time 1 financial performance measures were controlled, revealed that charisma increased financial performance; however culture did not do so. Culture and charisma were significantly related to perceived performance, and culture and charisma were interrelated. A longer time interval may be necessary before the effects of culture on financial performance become apparent. The findings are discussed against the backdrop of the value of intangible resources.",
author = "C.P.M. Wilderom and {van den Berg}, P.T. and U.J. Wiersma",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.04.002",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "835--848",
journal = "Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

A longitudinal study of the effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on objective and perceived corporate performance. / Wilderom, C.P.M.; van den Berg, P.T.; Wiersma, U.J.

In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2012, p. 835-848.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A longitudinal study of the effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on objective and perceived corporate performance

AU - Wilderom, C.P.M.

AU - van den Berg, P.T.

AU - Wiersma, U.J.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - We investigated the combined effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on perceived and objective company performance using a longitudinal design. Employees (N = 1214) in 46 branches of a large Dutch bank rated branch management on charismatic leadership, organizational culture in terms of work practices, as well as perceived organizational performance. Objective performance data were collected twice, two years apart. The split sample technique attenuated common source bias. Results of structural equation modeling, in which Time 1 financial performance measures were controlled, revealed that charisma increased financial performance; however culture did not do so. Culture and charisma were significantly related to perceived performance, and culture and charisma were interrelated. A longer time interval may be necessary before the effects of culture on financial performance become apparent. The findings are discussed against the backdrop of the value of intangible resources.

AB - We investigated the combined effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on perceived and objective company performance using a longitudinal design. Employees (N = 1214) in 46 branches of a large Dutch bank rated branch management on charismatic leadership, organizational culture in terms of work practices, as well as perceived organizational performance. Objective performance data were collected twice, two years apart. The split sample technique attenuated common source bias. Results of structural equation modeling, in which Time 1 financial performance measures were controlled, revealed that charisma increased financial performance; however culture did not do so. Culture and charisma were significantly related to perceived performance, and culture and charisma were interrelated. A longer time interval may be necessary before the effects of culture on financial performance become apparent. The findings are discussed against the backdrop of the value of intangible resources.

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.04.002

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 835

EP - 848

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 5

ER -