A meta-analysis of whether groups make more risky or more cautious decisions than individuals (abstract)

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractOther research output

Abstract

Over five decades of research has yielded mixed findings as to whether groups make more risky or more cautious decisions than individuals. We contrast four theories that have been used in the extant literature to explain such a shift in group- as opposed to individual decision making. By means of a meta-analysis of 33 articles and 126 effect sizes, we were able to evaluate the evidence for the occurrence of shifts while considering the potential influence of the various conditions. Our results indicate an overall tendency for a risky shift, which is also affected by a number of conditions. Specifically, the occurrence of a shift is affected by the extent to which members are exposed to each others' preferences, the culture where the study is conducted, the extent to which decision makers are affected by their decision, and the extent to which a task is risk- or caution-oriented. We discuss to what extent our findings support each of the four theories, propose an integrative perspective, and set an agenda for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Article number16461
JournalAcademy of Management Proceedings
Volume2016
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

decision maker
Group
decision making
evidence
literature

Cite this

@article{895dc90364284ed5be4c79d401332004,
title = "A meta-analysis of whether groups make more risky or more cautious decisions than individuals (abstract)",
abstract = "Over five decades of research has yielded mixed findings as to whether groups make more risky or more cautious decisions than individuals. We contrast four theories that have been used in the extant literature to explain such a shift in group- as opposed to individual decision making. By means of a meta-analysis of 33 articles and 126 effect sizes, we were able to evaluate the evidence for the occurrence of shifts while considering the potential influence of the various conditions. Our results indicate an overall tendency for a risky shift, which is also affected by a number of conditions. Specifically, the occurrence of a shift is affected by the extent to which members are exposed to each others' preferences, the culture where the study is conducted, the extent to which decision makers are affected by their decision, and the extent to which a task is risk- or caution-oriented. We discuss to what extent our findings support each of the four theories, propose an integrative perspective, and set an agenda for future research.",
author = "G. Dodoiu and R.T.A.J. Leenders and {van Dijk}, H.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2016.194",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
journal = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
issn = "0065-0668",
publisher = "Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510",
number = "1",

}

A meta-analysis of whether groups make more risky or more cautious decisions than individuals (abstract). / Dodoiu, G.; Leenders, R.T.A.J.; van Dijk, H.

In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2016, No. 1, 16461, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractOther research output

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of whether groups make more risky or more cautious decisions than individuals (abstract)

AU - Dodoiu, G.

AU - Leenders, R.T.A.J.

AU - van Dijk, H.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Over five decades of research has yielded mixed findings as to whether groups make more risky or more cautious decisions than individuals. We contrast four theories that have been used in the extant literature to explain such a shift in group- as opposed to individual decision making. By means of a meta-analysis of 33 articles and 126 effect sizes, we were able to evaluate the evidence for the occurrence of shifts while considering the potential influence of the various conditions. Our results indicate an overall tendency for a risky shift, which is also affected by a number of conditions. Specifically, the occurrence of a shift is affected by the extent to which members are exposed to each others' preferences, the culture where the study is conducted, the extent to which decision makers are affected by their decision, and the extent to which a task is risk- or caution-oriented. We discuss to what extent our findings support each of the four theories, propose an integrative perspective, and set an agenda for future research.

AB - Over five decades of research has yielded mixed findings as to whether groups make more risky or more cautious decisions than individuals. We contrast four theories that have been used in the extant literature to explain such a shift in group- as opposed to individual decision making. By means of a meta-analysis of 33 articles and 126 effect sizes, we were able to evaluate the evidence for the occurrence of shifts while considering the potential influence of the various conditions. Our results indicate an overall tendency for a risky shift, which is also affected by a number of conditions. Specifically, the occurrence of a shift is affected by the extent to which members are exposed to each others' preferences, the culture where the study is conducted, the extent to which decision makers are affected by their decision, and the extent to which a task is risk- or caution-oriented. We discuss to what extent our findings support each of the four theories, propose an integrative perspective, and set an agenda for future research.

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2016.194

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2016.194

M3 - Meeting Abstract

VL - 2016

JO - Academy of Management Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Proceedings

SN - 0065-0668

IS - 1

M1 - 16461

ER -