A meta-analytic review of moral licensing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Moral licensing refers to the effect that when people initially behave in a moral way, they are later more likely to display behaviors that are immoral, unethical, or otherwise problematic. We provide a state-of-the-art overview of moral licensing by conducting a meta-analysis of 91 studies (7,397 participants) that compare a licensing condition with a control condition. Based on this analysis, the magnitude of the moral licensing effect is estimated to be a Cohen’s d of 0.31. We tested potential moderators and found that published studies tend to have larger moral licensing effects than unpublished studies. We found no empirical evidence for other moderators that were theorized to be of importance. The effect size estimate implies that studies require many more participants to draw solid conclusions about moral licensing and its possible moderators.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)540-558
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{25c1748127b2464399357fa52c43ee16,
title = "A meta-analytic review of moral licensing",
abstract = "Moral licensing refers to the effect that when people initially behave in a moral way, they are later more likely to display behaviors that are immoral, unethical, or otherwise problematic. We provide a state-of-the-art overview of moral licensing by conducting a meta-analysis of 91 studies (7,397 participants) that compare a licensing condition with a control condition. Based on this analysis, the magnitude of the moral licensing effect is estimated to be a Cohen’s d of 0.31. We tested potential moderators and found that published studies tend to have larger moral licensing effects than unpublished studies. We found no empirical evidence for other moderators that were theorized to be of importance. The effect size estimate implies that studies require many more participants to draw solid conclusions about moral licensing and its possible moderators.",
author = "I. Blanken and {van de Ven}, N. and M. Zeelenberg",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/0146167215572134",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "540--558",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "4",

}

A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. / Blanken, I.; van de Ven, N.; Zeelenberg, M.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2015, p. 540-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analytic review of moral licensing

AU - Blanken, I.

AU - van de Ven, N.

AU - Zeelenberg, M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Moral licensing refers to the effect that when people initially behave in a moral way, they are later more likely to display behaviors that are immoral, unethical, or otherwise problematic. We provide a state-of-the-art overview of moral licensing by conducting a meta-analysis of 91 studies (7,397 participants) that compare a licensing condition with a control condition. Based on this analysis, the magnitude of the moral licensing effect is estimated to be a Cohen’s d of 0.31. We tested potential moderators and found that published studies tend to have larger moral licensing effects than unpublished studies. We found no empirical evidence for other moderators that were theorized to be of importance. The effect size estimate implies that studies require many more participants to draw solid conclusions about moral licensing and its possible moderators.

AB - Moral licensing refers to the effect that when people initially behave in a moral way, they are later more likely to display behaviors that are immoral, unethical, or otherwise problematic. We provide a state-of-the-art overview of moral licensing by conducting a meta-analysis of 91 studies (7,397 participants) that compare a licensing condition with a control condition. Based on this analysis, the magnitude of the moral licensing effect is estimated to be a Cohen’s d of 0.31. We tested potential moderators and found that published studies tend to have larger moral licensing effects than unpublished studies. We found no empirical evidence for other moderators that were theorized to be of importance. The effect size estimate implies that studies require many more participants to draw solid conclusions about moral licensing and its possible moderators.

U2 - 10.1177/0146167215572134

DO - 10.1177/0146167215572134

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 540

EP - 558

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 4

ER -