Abstract
Open peer commentary to "Leising, D., Thielmann, I. Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (2022). Ten steps toward a better personality science: How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation" (https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6029). In their target paper, Leising et al. presented a number of steps that personality researchers (and others) may take to improve the scientific standards in their field. Leising et al. answer to these comments in a rejoinder (https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.7961).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e9227 |
| Pages (from-to) | 18-21 |
| Journal | Personality Science |
| Volume | 3 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A new academic incentive structure: Does it fit the psychology of human motives?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver