A ‘no’ to data retention in the Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

Abstract

Case C/09/480009 / KG ZA 14/1575, Privacy First cs vs. the Dutch State, 11 March 2015, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:2498
The summary proceedings judge of The Hague has declared the ‘Wet bewaarplicht telecommunicatiegegevens’ non-binding. This law obliges providers of telephone services and internet services to store traffic data and location data of the users. The law infringes the respect for private and family life and the protection of personal data. The judge considers this infringement not be limited to what is strictly necessary (the official head note translated by the author).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-156
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Data Protection Law Review
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Netherlands
personal data
Law
telephone
privacy
respect
traffic
Internet

Keywords

  • Data protection
  • Data retention
  • Case note
  • The Netherlands

Cite this

@article{e7b2319efe264dea82d63a5758a0674d,
title = "A ‘no’ to data retention in the Netherlands",
abstract = "Case C/09/480009 / KG ZA 14/1575, Privacy First cs vs. the Dutch State, 11 March 2015, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:2498The summary proceedings judge of The Hague has declared the ‘Wet bewaarplicht telecommunicatiegegevens’ non-binding. This law obliges providers of telephone services and internet services to store traffic data and location data of the users. The law infringes the respect for private and family life and the protection of personal data. The judge considers this infringement not be limited to what is strictly necessary (the official head note translated by the author).",
keywords = "Data protection, Data retention, Case note, The Netherlands",
author = "{van Schendel}, Sascha",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.21552/EDPL/2015/2/12",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "153--156",
journal = "European Data Protection Law Review",
issn = "2364-2831",
number = "2",

}

A ‘no’ to data retention in the Netherlands. / van Schendel, Sascha.

In: European Data Protection Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2015, p. 153-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

TY - JOUR

T1 - A ‘no’ to data retention in the Netherlands

AU - van Schendel, Sascha

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Case C/09/480009 / KG ZA 14/1575, Privacy First cs vs. the Dutch State, 11 March 2015, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:2498The summary proceedings judge of The Hague has declared the ‘Wet bewaarplicht telecommunicatiegegevens’ non-binding. This law obliges providers of telephone services and internet services to store traffic data and location data of the users. The law infringes the respect for private and family life and the protection of personal data. The judge considers this infringement not be limited to what is strictly necessary (the official head note translated by the author).

AB - Case C/09/480009 / KG ZA 14/1575, Privacy First cs vs. the Dutch State, 11 March 2015, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:2498The summary proceedings judge of The Hague has declared the ‘Wet bewaarplicht telecommunicatiegegevens’ non-binding. This law obliges providers of telephone services and internet services to store traffic data and location data of the users. The law infringes the respect for private and family life and the protection of personal data. The judge considers this infringement not be limited to what is strictly necessary (the official head note translated by the author).

KW - Data protection

KW - Data retention

KW - Case note

KW - The Netherlands

UR - https://edpl.lexxion.eu/article/EDPL/2015/2/12

U2 - 10.21552/EDPL/2015/2/12

DO - 10.21552/EDPL/2015/2/12

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 153

EP - 156

JO - European Data Protection Law Review

JF - European Data Protection Law Review

SN - 2364-2831

IS - 2

ER -