A pluralistic perspective to overcome major blind spots in research on interorganizational relationships

Fabrice Lumineau, Nuno Oliveira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Interorganizational relationships have attracted much scholarly attention in the last two decades. Despite the significant advances made in this field, the literature still largely relies on assumptions that overlook core features of interorganizational relationships. We build on the organizational research on pluralism to evaluate and identify opportunities to extend the literature on interorganizational relationships. Drawing on a synthesis of the last 20 years of research (1996–2016) on interorganizational relationships, we discuss four major “blind spots” concerning (1) the assumption of symmetry between parties or the focal party’s perception is taken to reflect the whole relationship (single-party focus), (2) the assumption of uniform relationships between parties (single-valence focus), (3) the assumption of an interorganizational phenomenon within one level of analysis (single-level focus), and (4) the assumption of universal time (focus on a single conceptualization of time). Through an analysis of exemplary studies, we discuss how and when overcoming each of these blind spots provides novel insights to revisit theoretical mechanisms concerning the functioning of interorganizational relationships. We also identify a coherent set of strategies to address each blind spot. We advance the literature by articulating a pluralistic perspective to guide future research into core questions about interorganizational relationships.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-465
JournalAcademy of Management Annals
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Interorganizational relationships
Functioning
Conceptualization
Symmetry
Valence
Levels of analysis
Organizational research
Pluralism

Cite this

@article{0d4bffc3e0ca4d4a9694cc9f4f70648a,
title = "A pluralistic perspective to overcome major blind spots in research on interorganizational relationships",
abstract = "Interorganizational relationships have attracted much scholarly attention in the last two decades. Despite the significant advances made in this field, the literature still largely relies on assumptions that overlook core features of interorganizational relationships. We build on the organizational research on pluralism to evaluate and identify opportunities to extend the literature on interorganizational relationships. Drawing on a synthesis of the last 20 years of research (1996–2016) on interorganizational relationships, we discuss four major “blind spots” concerning (1) the assumption of symmetry between parties or the focal party’s perception is taken to reflect the whole relationship (single-party focus), (2) the assumption of uniform relationships between parties (single-valence focus), (3) the assumption of an interorganizational phenomenon within one level of analysis (single-level focus), and (4) the assumption of universal time (focus on a single conceptualization of time). Through an analysis of exemplary studies, we discuss how and when overcoming each of these blind spots provides novel insights to revisit theoretical mechanisms concerning the functioning of interorganizational relationships. We also identify a coherent set of strategies to address each blind spot. We advance the literature by articulating a pluralistic perspective to guide future research into core questions about interorganizational relationships.",
author = "Fabrice Lumineau and Nuno Oliveira",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.5465/annals.2016.0033",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "440--465",
journal = "Academy of Management Annals",
issn = "1941-6520",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

A pluralistic perspective to overcome major blind spots in research on interorganizational relationships. / Lumineau, Fabrice; Oliveira, Nuno.

In: Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2018, p. 440-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pluralistic perspective to overcome major blind spots in research on interorganizational relationships

AU - Lumineau, Fabrice

AU - Oliveira, Nuno

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Interorganizational relationships have attracted much scholarly attention in the last two decades. Despite the significant advances made in this field, the literature still largely relies on assumptions that overlook core features of interorganizational relationships. We build on the organizational research on pluralism to evaluate and identify opportunities to extend the literature on interorganizational relationships. Drawing on a synthesis of the last 20 years of research (1996–2016) on interorganizational relationships, we discuss four major “blind spots” concerning (1) the assumption of symmetry between parties or the focal party’s perception is taken to reflect the whole relationship (single-party focus), (2) the assumption of uniform relationships between parties (single-valence focus), (3) the assumption of an interorganizational phenomenon within one level of analysis (single-level focus), and (4) the assumption of universal time (focus on a single conceptualization of time). Through an analysis of exemplary studies, we discuss how and when overcoming each of these blind spots provides novel insights to revisit theoretical mechanisms concerning the functioning of interorganizational relationships. We also identify a coherent set of strategies to address each blind spot. We advance the literature by articulating a pluralistic perspective to guide future research into core questions about interorganizational relationships.

AB - Interorganizational relationships have attracted much scholarly attention in the last two decades. Despite the significant advances made in this field, the literature still largely relies on assumptions that overlook core features of interorganizational relationships. We build on the organizational research on pluralism to evaluate and identify opportunities to extend the literature on interorganizational relationships. Drawing on a synthesis of the last 20 years of research (1996–2016) on interorganizational relationships, we discuss four major “blind spots” concerning (1) the assumption of symmetry between parties or the focal party’s perception is taken to reflect the whole relationship (single-party focus), (2) the assumption of uniform relationships between parties (single-valence focus), (3) the assumption of an interorganizational phenomenon within one level of analysis (single-level focus), and (4) the assumption of universal time (focus on a single conceptualization of time). Through an analysis of exemplary studies, we discuss how and when overcoming each of these blind spots provides novel insights to revisit theoretical mechanisms concerning the functioning of interorganizational relationships. We also identify a coherent set of strategies to address each blind spot. We advance the literature by articulating a pluralistic perspective to guide future research into core questions about interorganizational relationships.

U2 - 10.5465/annals.2016.0033

DO - 10.5465/annals.2016.0033

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 440

EP - 465

JO - Academy of Management Annals

JF - Academy of Management Annals

SN - 1941-6520

IS - 1

ER -