Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A question of timing: Confronting time-related issues in design

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Design practice straddles time; problems in the present, which often exist because of problematic choices in the past, are solved by the foreseen thing that (hopefully) leads to a better future. This linear attitude towards time, largely a legacy of modernity, results in a number of time-related issues. In this paper we address and illustrate with examples some of these issues, including: future as a belief (progress dogma); instrumentalised solutions through the (historical) normalisation of systems and values; stale future imaginaries (robots, smart homes, automobiles); regurgitated pasts (nostalgia). One example of this last issue is a supermarket like Whole Foods, where every detail is designed to create the illusion of a nostalgic country market. Such a dual focus on the past and possible futures often neglects urgent issues in the present (which will happen in someone else’s future). The problem of how to design for the present necessitates a redefinition, a radical change in attitude. We conclude by proposing some experimental shifts, including non-linear approaches to time (counterfactuals, time loops) and a purist’s approach (perfection beyond evolution, e.g. a French cafe glass or a violin).
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2026
EventTwentieth International Conference on Design Principles and Practices - Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
Duration: 25 Feb 202627 Feb 2026
https://designprinciplesandpractices.com/about/history/2026-conference

Conference

ConferenceTwentieth International Conference on Design Principles and Practices
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityRome
Period25/02/2627/02/26
Internet address

Keywords

  • Design
  • Speculative design
  • Design education
  • Counterfactuals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A question of timing: Confronting time-related issues in design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this