A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?

Stefanos E Prouskas*, Menno M Schoonheim, Marijn Huiskamp, Martijn D Steenwijk, Karin Gehring, Frederik Barkhof, Brigit A de Jong, Margriet M Sitskoorn, Jeroen J.G. Geurts, Hanneke E Hulst

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
93 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: 

Cognitive training elicits mild-to-moderate improvements in cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), although response heterogeneity limits overall effectiveness.

Objective: 

To identify patient characteristics associated with response and non-response to cognitive training.

Methods: 

Eighty-two PwMS were randomized into a 7-week attention training ( n  = 58, age = 48.4 ± 10.2 years) or a waiting-list control group ( n  = 24, age = 48.5 ± 9.4 years). Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at baseline and post-intervention. Twenty-one healthy controls (HCs, age = 50.27 ± 10.15 years) were included at baseline. Responders were defined with a reliable change index of 1.64 on at least 2/6 cognitive domains. General linear models and logistic regression were applied.

Results: 

Responders ( n  = 36) and non-responders ( n  = 22) did not differ on demographics, clinical variables and baseline cognition and structural MRI. However, non-responders exhibited a higher baseline functional connectivity (FC) between the default-mode network (DMN) and the ventral attention network (VAN), compared with responders ( p  = 0.018) and HCs ( p  = 0.001). Conversely, responders exhibited no significant baseline differences in FC compared with HCs. Response to cognitive training was predicted by lower DMN-VAN FC ( p  = 0.004) and DMN-frontoparietal FC ( p  = 0.029) (Nagelkerke R 2  = 0.25).

Conclusion: 

An intact pre-intervention FC is associated with cognitive training responsivity in pwMS, suggesting a window of opportunity for successful cognitive interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2124-2136
JournalMultiple Sclerosis
Volume28
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Brain
  • Brain Mapping/methods
  • Cognition Disorders
  • Cognition/physiology
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Sclerosis/complications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this