A sequential analysis of the welfare effects of mobile phones in Africa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is to assess the welfare effects of situations in which either mobile phone devices or SIM cards (or both) are not owned by relatively poor inhabitants of African countries. The task is pursued in a sequential analytical framework where effects at different stages of the process influence the welfare impact at later stages. Much of the analysis is conducted in different institutional circumstances from those found in the West (notably sharing and renting). Perhaps the main result of the analysis—backed by ample empirical evidence—is that the fewer are the alternatives to mobile phones as forms of communication (e.g., public transport), the greater tend to be the gains from this technology. In the particular case of leapfrogging, the fewer are fixed-line phones, the more do mobiles yield gains to poor users, whether these be individuals or actual countries. It is thus the context in addition to the technology that determines the differential welfare gains.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Science Computer Review
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Mobile phones
welfare
public transport
inhabitant
Communication
communication
sequential analysis

Keywords

  • ownership
  • rental
  • fixed phones
  • communications
  • leapfrogging

Cite this

@article{fe29052367b04e56832f9fba30ffc844,
title = "A sequential analysis of the welfare effects of mobile phones in Africa",
abstract = "The main purpose of this article is to assess the welfare effects of situations in which either mobile phone devices or SIM cards (or both) are not owned by relatively poor inhabitants of African countries. The task is pursued in a sequential analytical framework where effects at different stages of the process influence the welfare impact at later stages. Much of the analysis is conducted in different institutional circumstances from those found in the West (notably sharing and renting). Perhaps the main result of the analysis—backed by ample empirical evidence—is that the fewer are the alternatives to mobile phones as forms of communication (e.g., public transport), the greater tend to be the gains from this technology. In the particular case of leapfrogging, the fewer are fixed-line phones, the more do mobiles yield gains to poor users, whether these be individuals or actual countries. It is thus the context in addition to the technology that determines the differential welfare gains.",
keywords = "ownership, rental, fixed phones, communications, leapfrogging",
author = "Michael James",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0894439317754183",
language = "English",
journal = "Social Science Computer Review",
issn = "0894-4393",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

A sequential analysis of the welfare effects of mobile phones in Africa. / James, Michael.

In: Social Science Computer Review, 04.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A sequential analysis of the welfare effects of mobile phones in Africa

AU - James, Michael

PY - 2018/2/4

Y1 - 2018/2/4

N2 - The main purpose of this article is to assess the welfare effects of situations in which either mobile phone devices or SIM cards (or both) are not owned by relatively poor inhabitants of African countries. The task is pursued in a sequential analytical framework where effects at different stages of the process influence the welfare impact at later stages. Much of the analysis is conducted in different institutional circumstances from those found in the West (notably sharing and renting). Perhaps the main result of the analysis—backed by ample empirical evidence—is that the fewer are the alternatives to mobile phones as forms of communication (e.g., public transport), the greater tend to be the gains from this technology. In the particular case of leapfrogging, the fewer are fixed-line phones, the more do mobiles yield gains to poor users, whether these be individuals or actual countries. It is thus the context in addition to the technology that determines the differential welfare gains.

AB - The main purpose of this article is to assess the welfare effects of situations in which either mobile phone devices or SIM cards (or both) are not owned by relatively poor inhabitants of African countries. The task is pursued in a sequential analytical framework where effects at different stages of the process influence the welfare impact at later stages. Much of the analysis is conducted in different institutional circumstances from those found in the West (notably sharing and renting). Perhaps the main result of the analysis—backed by ample empirical evidence—is that the fewer are the alternatives to mobile phones as forms of communication (e.g., public transport), the greater tend to be the gains from this technology. In the particular case of leapfrogging, the fewer are fixed-line phones, the more do mobiles yield gains to poor users, whether these be individuals or actual countries. It is thus the context in addition to the technology that determines the differential welfare gains.

KW - ownership

KW - rental

KW - fixed phones

KW - communications

KW - leapfrogging

U2 - 10.1177/0894439317754183

DO - 10.1177/0894439317754183

M3 - Article

JO - Social Science Computer Review

JF - Social Science Computer Review

SN - 0894-4393

ER -