A spatial oddity: What can international law learn from informal bounding practices?

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperScientific

Abstract

This paper analyses the law of informal boundary making in Israel/Palestine and the Morocco–Spain borders. I ask how states actively exploit informal bounding practices to escape legal accountability and what structural limitations international law faces in contexts that go beyond formal bounding practices. International legal scholarship has been overwhelmingly concerned with formal boundaries –territorial state borders– while relegating other bounding practices –dynamic, shifting, paradoxical– to the subordinate field of informal international lawmaking (IN-LAW). Beneath the binomial formal/informal boundary making lies a historically contingent relationship of power and space that underpins international law as a system of spatially-bounded territorial states.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
Publication statusUnpublished - 2023
Event2023 Global Scholars Academy - Institute for Global Law & Policy (IGLP) - Stellenbosch University , South Africa, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Duration: 16 Jan 202320 Jan 2023
https://iglp.law.harvard.edu/events/2023-global-scholars-academy/

Conference

Conference2023 Global Scholars Academy - Institute for Global Law & Policy (IGLP)
Country/TerritorySouth Africa
CityStellenbosch
Period16/01/2320/01/23
Internet address

Keywords

  • legal boundaries
  • Borders
  • Territoriality
  • Sovereignty
  • Informal lawmaking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A spatial oddity: What can international law learn from informal bounding practices?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this