A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia

Remco S. Mannak*, Marius T.H. Meeus, Jörg Raab, Alexander C. Smit

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Divergent time norms between participating organizations constitute a central barrier to cross-sectoral collaborations. We unpack this tension by studying two distinct time-utilization strategies of university and industry in 1845 R&D consortia. The paper shows that collaborating organizations that are subject to divergent time norms can shift the time focus in their favor through the strategic timing of repeated ties. If university-industry consortia are repeated, this repetition tends to take place either at the beginning of the consortium (parallel timing) or at the end (sequential timing) but typically not in the middle. Industry partners seek to “compress time” by working on different consortia in parallel and therefore want to repeat a collaboration early, whereas universities seek to “extend time” through sequential timing of consortia, i.e., repeat a collaboration at the end or after a consortium has ended. We provide a qualitative substantiation of the identified time-utilization strategies and show that both options coexist in multipartner consortia.
Original languageEnglish
Article number103829
JournalResearch Policy: A Journal devoted to Research Policy, Research Management and Planning
Volume48
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Industry
Consortium

Keywords

  • University-industry collaboration
  • Repeated collaboration
  • Time norms and timing preferences
  • Multipartner R&D-consortia
  • Collaboration barriers
  • DYNAMICS
  • TIME
  • COMMERCIALIZATION
  • MODEL
  • OF-THE-LITERATURE

Cite this

@article{745c6a63e9cd45adad5518934fba9efb,
title = "A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia",
abstract = "Divergent time norms between participating organizations constitute a central barrier to cross-sectoral collaborations. We unpack this tension by studying two distinct time-utilization strategies of university and industry in 1845 R&D consortia. The paper shows that collaborating organizations that are subject to divergent time norms can shift the time focus in their favor through the strategic timing of repeated ties. If university-industry consortia are repeated, this repetition tends to take place either at the beginning of the consortium (parallel timing) or at the end (sequential timing) but typically not in the middle. Industry partners seek to “compress time” by working on different consortia in parallel and therefore want to repeat a collaboration early, whereas universities seek to “extend time” through sequential timing of consortia, i.e., repeat a collaboration at the end or after a consortium has ended. We provide a qualitative substantiation of the identified time-utilization strategies and show that both options coexist in multipartner consortia.",
keywords = "University-industry collaboration, Repeated collaboration, Time norms and timing preferences, Multipartner R&D-consortia, Collaboration barriers, DYNAMICS, TIME, COMMERCIALIZATION, MODEL, OF-THE-LITERATURE",
author = "Mannak, {Remco S.} and Meeus, {Marius T.H.} and J{\"o}rg Raab and Smit, {Alexander C.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2019.103829",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
journal = "Research Policy: A Journal devoted to Research Policy, Research Management and Planning",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia

AU - Mannak, Remco S.

AU - Meeus, Marius T.H.

AU - Raab, Jörg

AU - Smit, Alexander C.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Divergent time norms between participating organizations constitute a central barrier to cross-sectoral collaborations. We unpack this tension by studying two distinct time-utilization strategies of university and industry in 1845 R&D consortia. The paper shows that collaborating organizations that are subject to divergent time norms can shift the time focus in their favor through the strategic timing of repeated ties. If university-industry consortia are repeated, this repetition tends to take place either at the beginning of the consortium (parallel timing) or at the end (sequential timing) but typically not in the middle. Industry partners seek to “compress time” by working on different consortia in parallel and therefore want to repeat a collaboration early, whereas universities seek to “extend time” through sequential timing of consortia, i.e., repeat a collaboration at the end or after a consortium has ended. We provide a qualitative substantiation of the identified time-utilization strategies and show that both options coexist in multipartner consortia.

AB - Divergent time norms between participating organizations constitute a central barrier to cross-sectoral collaborations. We unpack this tension by studying two distinct time-utilization strategies of university and industry in 1845 R&D consortia. The paper shows that collaborating organizations that are subject to divergent time norms can shift the time focus in their favor through the strategic timing of repeated ties. If university-industry consortia are repeated, this repetition tends to take place either at the beginning of the consortium (parallel timing) or at the end (sequential timing) but typically not in the middle. Industry partners seek to “compress time” by working on different consortia in parallel and therefore want to repeat a collaboration early, whereas universities seek to “extend time” through sequential timing of consortia, i.e., repeat a collaboration at the end or after a consortium has ended. We provide a qualitative substantiation of the identified time-utilization strategies and show that both options coexist in multipartner consortia.

KW - University-industry collaboration

KW - Repeated collaboration

KW - Time norms and timing preferences

KW - Multipartner R&D-consortia

KW - Collaboration barriers

KW - DYNAMICS

KW - TIME

KW - COMMERCIALIZATION

KW - MODEL

KW - OF-THE-LITERATURE

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103829

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103829

M3 - Article

VL - 48

JO - Research Policy: A Journal devoted to Research Policy, Research Management and Planning

JF - Research Policy: A Journal devoted to Research Policy, Research Management and Planning

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 9

M1 - 103829

ER -