A thematic analysis of shared decision-making in consultations with patients with a presumed brain tumor and neurosurgeons

Background: Patients with brain tumors, family members, and healthcare professionals face complex healthcare decisions that can significantly impact everyday life. Engaging in shared decision-making (SDM) can help ensure treatment decisions align with patients' preferences and goals. Little is known about the decision-making process in neurosurgical consultations. This study aims to qualitatively explore and describe the SDM process during neurosurgical consultations for patients with a presumed brain tumor. Methods: The first consultation between patients with presumed glioma or meningioma and their neurosurgeons was audio-recorded and transcribed. Decision-making models were used as sensitization concepts, with coding carried out inductively. We employed a reflexive thematic analysis to develop themes and subthemes until saturation was beginning to emerge. Results: Analyzing eleven consultations, we developed three main themes and twelve subthemes. The results depict decision-making guided by neurosurgeons (theme 1), with varying degrees of engagement from patients and family members (theme 2) and personalization of the decision-making process based on the medical situation and everyday life priorities (theme 3). The consultations lacked specific attention to the everyday life priorities of the patients. Conclusions: The decision-making processes seemed to focus primarily on medically informing patients with a presumed brain tumor, in line with informed decision-making. However, less emphasis was placed on learning more about the patient's everyday life and preferences to integrate into the decision-making process, which is key to SDM. Incorporating patient goals may lead to greater personalization and decisions that align with both the patient's medical situation and their goals.