A theoretical framework of organizational change

G. Jacobs, L. Polos, A. van Witteloostuijn, J. Christe-Zyse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose
– Organizational change is a risky endeavour. Most change initiatives fall short on their goals and produce high opportunity and process costs, which at times outweigh the content benefits of organizational change. This paper seeks to develop a framework, offering a theoretical toolbox to analyze context‐dependent barriers and enablers of organizational change. Starting from an organizational identity perspective, it aims to link contingency‐based approaches, such as environmental scan, SWOT and stakeholder analysis, with insights from organizational behaviour research, such as knowledge sharing and leadership.

Design/methodology/approach
– The framework is informed by long‐lasting field research into organizational change in an international policing environment. The theories in the framework are selected from the perspective of field validity in two ways; they were chosen because the topics covered by these theories emerged as relevant during the field research and therefore it can be expected they have applicability to the field. The authors' insights and suggestions are summarised in 13 propositions throughout the text.

Findings
– The analysis provides a clear warning that organizational change is more risky and multifaceted than change initiators typically assume. It is stressed that the external environment and the internal dynamics of organizations co‐determine the meaning of managerial practices. This implies that cure‐all recipes to organizational change are bound to fail.

Originality/value
– This paper makes an ambitious attempt to cross disciplinary boundaries in the field of organizational change research to contribute to a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of change processes by integrating perspectives that focus on the internal context and the external environment of organizations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)772-792
JournalJournal of Organizational Change Management
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Theoretical framework
Organizational change
Costs
Field research
External environment
Warning
Enablers
Change process
Managerial practices
Stakeholder analysis
Organizational identity
Knowledge sharing
SWOT analysis
Organizational behaviour
Design methodology
Environmental analysis

Cite this

Jacobs, G., Polos, L., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Christe-Zyse, J. (2013). A theoretical framework of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(5), 772-792. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-09-2012-0137
Jacobs, G. ; Polos, L. ; van Witteloostuijn, A. ; Christe-Zyse, J. / A theoretical framework of organizational change. In: Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 772-792.
@article{83db9579c48344589e51f3e85694f516,
title = "A theoretical framework of organizational change",
abstract = "Purpose– Organizational change is a risky endeavour. Most change initiatives fall short on their goals and produce high opportunity and process costs, which at times outweigh the content benefits of organizational change. This paper seeks to develop a framework, offering a theoretical toolbox to analyze context‐dependent barriers and enablers of organizational change. Starting from an organizational identity perspective, it aims to link contingency‐based approaches, such as environmental scan, SWOT and stakeholder analysis, with insights from organizational behaviour research, such as knowledge sharing and leadership.Design/methodology/approach– The framework is informed by long‐lasting field research into organizational change in an international policing environment. The theories in the framework are selected from the perspective of field validity in two ways; they were chosen because the topics covered by these theories emerged as relevant during the field research and therefore it can be expected they have applicability to the field. The authors' insights and suggestions are summarised in 13 propositions throughout the text.Findings– The analysis provides a clear warning that organizational change is more risky and multifaceted than change initiators typically assume. It is stressed that the external environment and the internal dynamics of organizations co‐determine the meaning of managerial practices. This implies that cure‐all recipes to organizational change are bound to fail.Originality/value– This paper makes an ambitious attempt to cross disciplinary boundaries in the field of organizational change research to contribute to a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of change processes by integrating perspectives that focus on the internal context and the external environment of organizations.",
author = "G. Jacobs and L. Polos and {van Witteloostuijn}, A. and J. Christe-Zyse",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/jocm-09-2012-0137",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "772--792",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Change Management",
issn = "0953-4814",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Jacobs, G, Polos, L, van Witteloostuijn, A & Christe-Zyse, J 2013, 'A theoretical framework of organizational change', Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 772-792. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-09-2012-0137

A theoretical framework of organizational change. / Jacobs, G.; Polos, L.; van Witteloostuijn, A.; Christe-Zyse, J.

In: Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2013, p. 772-792.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A theoretical framework of organizational change

AU - Jacobs, G.

AU - Polos, L.

AU - van Witteloostuijn, A.

AU - Christe-Zyse, J.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose– Organizational change is a risky endeavour. Most change initiatives fall short on their goals and produce high opportunity and process costs, which at times outweigh the content benefits of organizational change. This paper seeks to develop a framework, offering a theoretical toolbox to analyze context‐dependent barriers and enablers of organizational change. Starting from an organizational identity perspective, it aims to link contingency‐based approaches, such as environmental scan, SWOT and stakeholder analysis, with insights from organizational behaviour research, such as knowledge sharing and leadership.Design/methodology/approach– The framework is informed by long‐lasting field research into organizational change in an international policing environment. The theories in the framework are selected from the perspective of field validity in two ways; they were chosen because the topics covered by these theories emerged as relevant during the field research and therefore it can be expected they have applicability to the field. The authors' insights and suggestions are summarised in 13 propositions throughout the text.Findings– The analysis provides a clear warning that organizational change is more risky and multifaceted than change initiators typically assume. It is stressed that the external environment and the internal dynamics of organizations co‐determine the meaning of managerial practices. This implies that cure‐all recipes to organizational change are bound to fail.Originality/value– This paper makes an ambitious attempt to cross disciplinary boundaries in the field of organizational change research to contribute to a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of change processes by integrating perspectives that focus on the internal context and the external environment of organizations.

AB - Purpose– Organizational change is a risky endeavour. Most change initiatives fall short on their goals and produce high opportunity and process costs, which at times outweigh the content benefits of organizational change. This paper seeks to develop a framework, offering a theoretical toolbox to analyze context‐dependent barriers and enablers of organizational change. Starting from an organizational identity perspective, it aims to link contingency‐based approaches, such as environmental scan, SWOT and stakeholder analysis, with insights from organizational behaviour research, such as knowledge sharing and leadership.Design/methodology/approach– The framework is informed by long‐lasting field research into organizational change in an international policing environment. The theories in the framework are selected from the perspective of field validity in two ways; they were chosen because the topics covered by these theories emerged as relevant during the field research and therefore it can be expected they have applicability to the field. The authors' insights and suggestions are summarised in 13 propositions throughout the text.Findings– The analysis provides a clear warning that organizational change is more risky and multifaceted than change initiators typically assume. It is stressed that the external environment and the internal dynamics of organizations co‐determine the meaning of managerial practices. This implies that cure‐all recipes to organizational change are bound to fail.Originality/value– This paper makes an ambitious attempt to cross disciplinary boundaries in the field of organizational change research to contribute to a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of change processes by integrating perspectives that focus on the internal context and the external environment of organizations.

U2 - 10.1108/jocm-09-2012-0137

DO - 10.1108/jocm-09-2012-0137

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 772

EP - 792

JO - Journal of Organizational Change Management

JF - Journal of Organizational Change Management

SN - 0953-4814

IS - 5

ER -