A typology of privacy

Bert Jaap Koops, Bryce Newell, Tjerk Timan, Ivan Skorvánek, Tomislav Chokrevski, Maša Galič

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Despite the difficulty of capturing the nature and boundaries of privacy, it is important to conceptualize it. Some scholars develop unitary theories of privacy in the form of a unified conceptual core; others offer classifications of privacy that make meaningful distinctions between different types of privacy. We argue that the latter approach is underdeveloped and in need of improvement. In this paper, we propose a typology of privacy that is more systematic and comprehensive than any existing model.

Our typology is developed, first, by a systematic analysis of constitutional protections of privacy in nine jurisdictions: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovenia. This analysis yields a broad overview of the types of privacy that constitutional law seeks to protect. Second, we have studied literature from privacy scholars in the same nine jurisdictions, in order to identify the main dimensions along which privacy can be classified. Our analysis led us to structure types of privacy in a two-dimensional mode, consisting of eight basic types of privacy (bodily, intellectual, spatial, decisional, communicational, associational, proprietary, and behavioral privacy), with an overlay of a ninth type (informational privacy) that overlaps, but does not coincide, with the eight basic types.

Because of the comprehensive and large-scale comparative nature of the analysis, this paper offers a fundamental contribution to the theoretical literature on privacy. Our typology can serve as an analytic and explanatory model that helps to understand what privacy is, why privacy cannot be reduced to informational privacy, how privacy relates to the right to privacy, and how the right to privacy varies, but also corresponds, across a broad range of countries.
LanguageEnglish
Pages483-575
JournalUniversity of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law
Volume38
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

privacy
typology
right to privacy
Privacy
jurisdiction
privacy law
constitutional law
Slovenia
Czech Republic
Poland
Italy
Netherlands

Cite this

Koops, Bert Jaap ; Newell, Bryce ; Timan, Tjerk ; Skorvánek, Ivan ; Chokrevski, Tomislav ; Galič, Maša. / A typology of privacy. In: University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 483-575
@article{a5ed37897a0a4b8382882feef5d6aaad,
title = "A typology of privacy",
abstract = "Despite the difficulty of capturing the nature and boundaries of privacy, it is important to conceptualize it. Some scholars develop unitary theories of privacy in the form of a unified conceptual core; others offer classifications of privacy that make meaningful distinctions between different types of privacy. We argue that the latter approach is underdeveloped and in need of improvement. In this paper, we propose a typology of privacy that is more systematic and comprehensive than any existing model. Our typology is developed, first, by a systematic analysis of constitutional protections of privacy in nine jurisdictions: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovenia. This analysis yields a broad overview of the types of privacy that constitutional law seeks to protect. Second, we have studied literature from privacy scholars in the same nine jurisdictions, in order to identify the main dimensions along which privacy can be classified. Our analysis led us to structure types of privacy in a two-dimensional mode, consisting of eight basic types of privacy (bodily, intellectual, spatial, decisional, communicational, associational, proprietary, and behavioral privacy), with an overlay of a ninth type (informational privacy) that overlaps, but does not coincide, with the eight basic types. Because of the comprehensive and large-scale comparative nature of the analysis, this paper offers a fundamental contribution to the theoretical literature on privacy. Our typology can serve as an analytic and explanatory model that helps to understand what privacy is, why privacy cannot be reduced to informational privacy, how privacy relates to the right to privacy, and how the right to privacy varies, but also corresponds, across a broad range of countries.",
author = "Koops, {Bert Jaap} and Bryce Newell and Tjerk Timan and Ivan Skorv{\'a}nek and Tomislav Chokrevski and Maša Galič",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "483--575",
journal = "University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law",
issn = "1086-7872",
publisher = "University of Pennsylvania Law School",
number = "2",

}

Koops, BJ, Newell, B, Timan, T, Skorvánek, I, Chokrevski, T & Galič, M 2017, 'A typology of privacy' University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 483-575.

A typology of privacy. / Koops, Bert Jaap; Newell, Bryce; Timan, Tjerk; Skorvánek, Ivan; Chokrevski, Tomislav; Galič, Maša.

In: University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2017, p. 483-575.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A typology of privacy

AU - Koops,Bert Jaap

AU - Newell,Bryce

AU - Timan,Tjerk

AU - Skorvánek,Ivan

AU - Chokrevski,Tomislav

AU - Galič,Maša

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Despite the difficulty of capturing the nature and boundaries of privacy, it is important to conceptualize it. Some scholars develop unitary theories of privacy in the form of a unified conceptual core; others offer classifications of privacy that make meaningful distinctions between different types of privacy. We argue that the latter approach is underdeveloped and in need of improvement. In this paper, we propose a typology of privacy that is more systematic and comprehensive than any existing model. Our typology is developed, first, by a systematic analysis of constitutional protections of privacy in nine jurisdictions: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovenia. This analysis yields a broad overview of the types of privacy that constitutional law seeks to protect. Second, we have studied literature from privacy scholars in the same nine jurisdictions, in order to identify the main dimensions along which privacy can be classified. Our analysis led us to structure types of privacy in a two-dimensional mode, consisting of eight basic types of privacy (bodily, intellectual, spatial, decisional, communicational, associational, proprietary, and behavioral privacy), with an overlay of a ninth type (informational privacy) that overlaps, but does not coincide, with the eight basic types. Because of the comprehensive and large-scale comparative nature of the analysis, this paper offers a fundamental contribution to the theoretical literature on privacy. Our typology can serve as an analytic and explanatory model that helps to understand what privacy is, why privacy cannot be reduced to informational privacy, how privacy relates to the right to privacy, and how the right to privacy varies, but also corresponds, across a broad range of countries.

AB - Despite the difficulty of capturing the nature and boundaries of privacy, it is important to conceptualize it. Some scholars develop unitary theories of privacy in the form of a unified conceptual core; others offer classifications of privacy that make meaningful distinctions between different types of privacy. We argue that the latter approach is underdeveloped and in need of improvement. In this paper, we propose a typology of privacy that is more systematic and comprehensive than any existing model. Our typology is developed, first, by a systematic analysis of constitutional protections of privacy in nine jurisdictions: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovenia. This analysis yields a broad overview of the types of privacy that constitutional law seeks to protect. Second, we have studied literature from privacy scholars in the same nine jurisdictions, in order to identify the main dimensions along which privacy can be classified. Our analysis led us to structure types of privacy in a two-dimensional mode, consisting of eight basic types of privacy (bodily, intellectual, spatial, decisional, communicational, associational, proprietary, and behavioral privacy), with an overlay of a ninth type (informational privacy) that overlaps, but does not coincide, with the eight basic types. Because of the comprehensive and large-scale comparative nature of the analysis, this paper offers a fundamental contribution to the theoretical literature on privacy. Our typology can serve as an analytic and explanatory model that helps to understand what privacy is, why privacy cannot be reduced to informational privacy, how privacy relates to the right to privacy, and how the right to privacy varies, but also corresponds, across a broad range of countries.

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 483

EP - 575

JO - University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law

T2 - University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law

JF - University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law

SN - 1086-7872

IS - 2

ER -