Absolute abundance and relative scarcity

Environmental policy with implementation lags

C. Di Maria, Sjak A. Smulders, E.H. van der Werf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We study the effectiveness of environmental policy in a model with nonrenewable resources and an unavoidable implementation lag. We find that a time lag between the announcement and the implementation of an emissions quota induces an increase in emissions in the period between the policy's announcement and implementation. Since a binding constraint on emissions restricts energy use during the implementation phase, more of the resources must be extracted outside of it. We call this the abundance effect. In the case of multiple resources that differ in their pollution intensity, a second channel emerges: since cleaner sources are relatively more valuable when the policy is implemented, it is optimal to conserve them before the cap is enforced. This ordering effect tends to induce a switch to dirtier resources before the policy is implemented, compounding the increase in emissions via the abundance channel. Using the announcement lag in Title IV of the 1990 CAAA as a case study we are able to empirically show that the abundance effect and ordering effect are both statistically and economically significant. We discuss a number of alternative policy options to deal with these undesirable side effects of policy announcements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-119
JournalEcological Economics
Volume74
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

environmental policy
resource
nonrenewable resource
energy use
policy
Announcement
Environmental policy
Lag
Scarcity
pollution
effect
Resources

Cite this

@article{05c6eb00538c4c1695345cc794960a29,
title = "Absolute abundance and relative scarcity: Environmental policy with implementation lags",
abstract = "We study the effectiveness of environmental policy in a model with nonrenewable resources and an unavoidable implementation lag. We find that a time lag between the announcement and the implementation of an emissions quota induces an increase in emissions in the period between the policy's announcement and implementation. Since a binding constraint on emissions restricts energy use during the implementation phase, more of the resources must be extracted outside of it. We call this the abundance effect. In the case of multiple resources that differ in their pollution intensity, a second channel emerges: since cleaner sources are relatively more valuable when the policy is implemented, it is optimal to conserve them before the cap is enforced. This ordering effect tends to induce a switch to dirtier resources before the policy is implemented, compounding the increase in emissions via the abundance channel. Using the announcement lag in Title IV of the 1990 CAAA as a case study we are able to empirically show that the abundance effect and ordering effect are both statistically and economically significant. We discuss a number of alternative policy options to deal with these undesirable side effects of policy announcements.",
author = "{Di Maria}, C. and Smulders, {Sjak A.} and {van der Werf}, E.H.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "104--119",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",

}

Absolute abundance and relative scarcity : Environmental policy with implementation lags. / Di Maria, C.; Smulders, Sjak A.; van der Werf, E.H.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 74, 2012, p. 104-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absolute abundance and relative scarcity

T2 - Environmental policy with implementation lags

AU - Di Maria, C.

AU - Smulders, Sjak A.

AU - van der Werf, E.H.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - We study the effectiveness of environmental policy in a model with nonrenewable resources and an unavoidable implementation lag. We find that a time lag between the announcement and the implementation of an emissions quota induces an increase in emissions in the period between the policy's announcement and implementation. Since a binding constraint on emissions restricts energy use during the implementation phase, more of the resources must be extracted outside of it. We call this the abundance effect. In the case of multiple resources that differ in their pollution intensity, a second channel emerges: since cleaner sources are relatively more valuable when the policy is implemented, it is optimal to conserve them before the cap is enforced. This ordering effect tends to induce a switch to dirtier resources before the policy is implemented, compounding the increase in emissions via the abundance channel. Using the announcement lag in Title IV of the 1990 CAAA as a case study we are able to empirically show that the abundance effect and ordering effect are both statistically and economically significant. We discuss a number of alternative policy options to deal with these undesirable side effects of policy announcements.

AB - We study the effectiveness of environmental policy in a model with nonrenewable resources and an unavoidable implementation lag. We find that a time lag between the announcement and the implementation of an emissions quota induces an increase in emissions in the period between the policy's announcement and implementation. Since a binding constraint on emissions restricts energy use during the implementation phase, more of the resources must be extracted outside of it. We call this the abundance effect. In the case of multiple resources that differ in their pollution intensity, a second channel emerges: since cleaner sources are relatively more valuable when the policy is implemented, it is optimal to conserve them before the cap is enforced. This ordering effect tends to induce a switch to dirtier resources before the policy is implemented, compounding the increase in emissions via the abundance channel. Using the announcement lag in Title IV of the 1990 CAAA as a case study we are able to empirically show that the abundance effect and ordering effect are both statistically and economically significant. We discuss a number of alternative policy options to deal with these undesirable side effects of policy announcements.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.003

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 104

EP - 119

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -