Academic language in elementary school mathematics

Academicness of teacher input during whole class instruction

Nanke Dokter, Rian Aarts, Jeanne Kurvers, Anje Ros, Sjaak Kroon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Students who are proficient academic language (AL) users, achieve better in school. To develop students’ AL register teachers’ AL input is necessary. The goal of this study was to investigate the extent of AL features in the language input first and second grade teachers give their students in whole class mathematics instruction. Five key features could be distinguished: lexical diversity, lexical complexity, lexical specificity, syntactic complexity and textual complexity. Teachers used all features, but the amount in which they used them varied. While all teachers used lexical specific language when teaching mathematics, they did not use very complex language input. The academicness of teachers’ input was significantly higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 with respect to lexical diversity and lexical specificity. The input during explanation and discussion only differed with regard to textual complexity, which was higher during explanation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-230
Number of pages18
JournalDutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

elementary school
mathematics
instruction
teacher
language
school grade
mathematics instruction
student
Elementary School
Mathematics
Academic Language
Teaching
school
Specificity

Keywords

  • academic language
  • teacher input
  • elementary school
  • mathematics instruction

Cite this

@article{10a47950484f4d9fbade158d3d08f042,
title = "Academic language in elementary school mathematics: Academicness of teacher input during whole class instruction",
abstract = "Students who are proficient academic language (AL) users, achieve better in school. To develop students’ AL register teachers’ AL input is necessary. The goal of this study was to investigate the extent of AL features in the language input first and second grade teachers give their students in whole class mathematics instruction. Five key features could be distinguished: lexical diversity, lexical complexity, lexical specificity, syntactic complexity and textual complexity. Teachers used all features, but the amount in which they used them varied. While all teachers used lexical specific language when teaching mathematics, they did not use very complex language input. The academicness of teachers’ input was significantly higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 with respect to lexical diversity and lexical specificity. The input during explanation and discussion only differed with regard to textual complexity, which was higher during explanation.",
keywords = "academic language, teacher input, elementary school, mathematics instruction",
author = "Nanke Dokter and Rian Aarts and Jeanne Kurvers and Anje Ros and Sjaak Kroon",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1075/dujal.17007.dok",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "213--230",
journal = "Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics",
issn = "2211-7245",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

Academic language in elementary school mathematics : Academicness of teacher input during whole class instruction. / Dokter, Nanke; Aarts, Rian; Kurvers, Jeanne; Ros, Anje; Kroon, Sjaak.

In: Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 6, No. 2, 30.12.2017, p. 213-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Academic language in elementary school mathematics

T2 - Academicness of teacher input during whole class instruction

AU - Dokter, Nanke

AU - Aarts, Rian

AU - Kurvers, Jeanne

AU - Ros, Anje

AU - Kroon, Sjaak

PY - 2017/12/30

Y1 - 2017/12/30

N2 - Students who are proficient academic language (AL) users, achieve better in school. To develop students’ AL register teachers’ AL input is necessary. The goal of this study was to investigate the extent of AL features in the language input first and second grade teachers give their students in whole class mathematics instruction. Five key features could be distinguished: lexical diversity, lexical complexity, lexical specificity, syntactic complexity and textual complexity. Teachers used all features, but the amount in which they used them varied. While all teachers used lexical specific language when teaching mathematics, they did not use very complex language input. The academicness of teachers’ input was significantly higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 with respect to lexical diversity and lexical specificity. The input during explanation and discussion only differed with regard to textual complexity, which was higher during explanation.

AB - Students who are proficient academic language (AL) users, achieve better in school. To develop students’ AL register teachers’ AL input is necessary. The goal of this study was to investigate the extent of AL features in the language input first and second grade teachers give their students in whole class mathematics instruction. Five key features could be distinguished: lexical diversity, lexical complexity, lexical specificity, syntactic complexity and textual complexity. Teachers used all features, but the amount in which they used them varied. While all teachers used lexical specific language when teaching mathematics, they did not use very complex language input. The academicness of teachers’ input was significantly higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 with respect to lexical diversity and lexical specificity. The input during explanation and discussion only differed with regard to textual complexity, which was higher during explanation.

KW - academic language

KW - teacher input

KW - elementary school

KW - mathematics instruction

U2 - 10.1075/dujal.17007.dok

DO - 10.1075/dujal.17007.dok

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 213

EP - 230

JO - Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics

JF - Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics

SN - 2211-7245

IS - 2

ER -