Accountability for the use of algorithms in a big data environment

Anton Vedder, Laurens Naudts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Accountability is the ability to provide good reasons in order to explain and to justify actions, decisions, and policies for a (hypothetical) forum of persons or organizations. Since decision-makers, both in the private and in the public sphere, increasingly rely on algorithms operating on Big Data for their decision-making, special mechanisms of accountability concerning the making and deployment of algorithms in that setting become gradually more urgent. In the upcoming General Data Protection Regulation, the importance of accountability and closely related concepts, such as transparency, as guiding protection principles, is emphasized. Yet, the accountability mechanisms inherent in the regulation cannot be appropriately applied to algorithms operating on Big Data and their societal impact. First, algorithms are complex. Second, algorithms often operate on a random group-level, which may pose additional difficulties when interpreting and articulating the risks of algorithmic decision-making processes. In light of the possible significance of the impact on human beings, the complexities and the broader scope of algorithms in a big data setting call for accountability mechanisms that transcend the mechanisms that are now inherent in the regulation.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Review of Law, Computers & Technology
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

responsibility
regulation
Decision making
data protection
Data privacy
human being
Transparency
decision-making process
transparency
Big data
decision maker
decision making
ability
Group

Keywords

  • Algorithms
  • BIG DATA
  • Ethics
  • Law
  • privacy
  • data protection
  • non-discrimination

Cite this

@article{e5a8bc1d8a334caa93dde9aeb840fb31,
title = "Accountability for the use of algorithms in a big data environment",
abstract = "Accountability is the ability to provide good reasons in order to explain and to justify actions, decisions, and policies for a (hypothetical) forum of persons or organizations. Since decision-makers, both in the private and in the public sphere, increasingly rely on algorithms operating on Big Data for their decision-making, special mechanisms of accountability concerning the making and deployment of algorithms in that setting become gradually more urgent. In the upcoming General Data Protection Regulation, the importance of accountability and closely related concepts, such as transparency, as guiding protection principles, is emphasized. Yet, the accountability mechanisms inherent in the regulation cannot be appropriately applied to algorithms operating on Big Data and their societal impact. First, algorithms are complex. Second, algorithms often operate on a random group-level, which may pose additional difficulties when interpreting and articulating the risks of algorithmic decision-making processes. In light of the possible significance of the impact on human beings, the complexities and the broader scope of algorithms in a big data setting call for accountability mechanisms that transcend the mechanisms that are now inherent in the regulation.",
keywords = "Algorithms, BIG DATA, Ethics, Law, privacy, data protection, non-discrimination",
author = "Anton Vedder and Laurens Naudts",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
journal = "International Review of Law, Computers & Technology",
issn = "1360-0869",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Accountability for the use of algorithms in a big data environment. / Vedder, Anton; Naudts, Laurens.

In: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accountability for the use of algorithms in a big data environment

AU - Vedder, Anton

AU - Naudts, Laurens

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Accountability is the ability to provide good reasons in order to explain and to justify actions, decisions, and policies for a (hypothetical) forum of persons or organizations. Since decision-makers, both in the private and in the public sphere, increasingly rely on algorithms operating on Big Data for their decision-making, special mechanisms of accountability concerning the making and deployment of algorithms in that setting become gradually more urgent. In the upcoming General Data Protection Regulation, the importance of accountability and closely related concepts, such as transparency, as guiding protection principles, is emphasized. Yet, the accountability mechanisms inherent in the regulation cannot be appropriately applied to algorithms operating on Big Data and their societal impact. First, algorithms are complex. Second, algorithms often operate on a random group-level, which may pose additional difficulties when interpreting and articulating the risks of algorithmic decision-making processes. In light of the possible significance of the impact on human beings, the complexities and the broader scope of algorithms in a big data setting call for accountability mechanisms that transcend the mechanisms that are now inherent in the regulation.

AB - Accountability is the ability to provide good reasons in order to explain and to justify actions, decisions, and policies for a (hypothetical) forum of persons or organizations. Since decision-makers, both in the private and in the public sphere, increasingly rely on algorithms operating on Big Data for their decision-making, special mechanisms of accountability concerning the making and deployment of algorithms in that setting become gradually more urgent. In the upcoming General Data Protection Regulation, the importance of accountability and closely related concepts, such as transparency, as guiding protection principles, is emphasized. Yet, the accountability mechanisms inherent in the regulation cannot be appropriately applied to algorithms operating on Big Data and their societal impact. First, algorithms are complex. Second, algorithms often operate on a random group-level, which may pose additional difficulties when interpreting and articulating the risks of algorithmic decision-making processes. In light of the possible significance of the impact on human beings, the complexities and the broader scope of algorithms in a big data setting call for accountability mechanisms that transcend the mechanisms that are now inherent in the regulation.

KW - Algorithms

KW - BIG DATA

KW - Ethics

KW - Law

KW - privacy

KW - data protection

KW - non-discrimination

M3 - Article

JO - International Review of Law, Computers & Technology

JF - International Review of Law, Computers & Technology

SN - 1360-0869

ER -