Accounting comparability and the accuracy of peer-based valuation models

S. Young, Y. Zeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)


We examine the link between enhanced accounting comparability and the valuation performance of pricing multiples. Using the warranted multiple method proposed by Bhojraj and Lee (2002, Journal of Accounting Research), we demonstrate how enhanced accounting comparability leads to better peer-based valuation performance. Empirical tests using firms from 15 EU countries over the period 1997-2011 (with comparable peers selected from the entire cross-section of foreign firms) document significant improvement in valuation performance measured as pricing accuracy, the ability of value estimates to explain cross-sectional variation in observed price, and the ability of the pricing multiple to predict future market-to-book multiples. Findings for a series of identification tests suggest that enhanced valuation performance is the consequence of improvements in the degree of cross-border accounting comparability that occurred during the sample window, and that a significant fraction of comparability gain operates through improved peer selection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2571-2601
JournalThe Accounting Review
Issue number6
Early online date13 Feb 2015
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015


  • equity valuation
  • pricing multiples
  • warranted multiple
  • peer selection
  • international accounting convergence
  • IFRS


Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting comparability and the accuracy of peer-based valuation models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this