Adjustment outcomes of immigrant children and youth in Europe

A meta-analysis

Radosveta Dimitrova, A. Chasiotis, F.J.R. van de Vijver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Compared to natives, immigrants have been reported to display either more (migration morbidity) or fewer (immigrant paradox) adjustment problems. We examined these two perspectives using a meta-analysis from 51 studies (N = 224,197), reporting internalizing, externalizing, and academic outcomes among immigrant children and youth in Europe. Overall, migration morbidity was better supported than the immigrant paradox. Migration morbidity was supported for (a) externalizing outcomes in Northern Europe and adolescent samples; (b) academic outcomes for low SES and fewer girls across samples; (c) internalizing outcomes in Western Europe and preadolescent samples. Cultural diversity and long-term residence of immigrants are favorable factors for the paradox in externalizing outcomes, whereas immigrant family reunion was predictive for the paradox in internalizing and academic outcomes. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)150-162
JournalEuropean Psychologist
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2016

Fingerprint

Reunion
Cultural Diversity
Meta-analysis
Immigrant children
Immigrants
Paradox
Morbidity
Residence
Preadolescents

Cite this

Dimitrova, Radosveta ; Chasiotis, A. ; van de Vijver, F.J.R. / Adjustment outcomes of immigrant children and youth in Europe : A meta-analysis. In: European Psychologist. 2016 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 150-162.
@article{bf8f186bd131421a9bf4a57071546601,
title = "Adjustment outcomes of immigrant children and youth in Europe: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Compared to natives, immigrants have been reported to display either more (migration morbidity) or fewer (immigrant paradox) adjustment problems. We examined these two perspectives using a meta-analysis from 51 studies (N = 224,197), reporting internalizing, externalizing, and academic outcomes among immigrant children and youth in Europe. Overall, migration morbidity was better supported than the immigrant paradox. Migration morbidity was supported for (a) externalizing outcomes in Northern Europe and adolescent samples; (b) academic outcomes for low SES and fewer girls across samples; (c) internalizing outcomes in Western Europe and preadolescent samples. Cultural diversity and long-term residence of immigrants are favorable factors for the paradox in externalizing outcomes, whereas immigrant family reunion was predictive for the paradox in internalizing and academic outcomes. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.",
author = "Radosveta Dimitrova and A. Chasiotis and {van de Vijver}, F.J.R.",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1027/1016-9040/a000246",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "150--162",
journal = "European Psychologist",
issn = "1016-9040",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Adjustment outcomes of immigrant children and youth in Europe : A meta-analysis. / Dimitrova, Radosveta; Chasiotis, A.; van de Vijver, F.J.R.

In: European Psychologist, Vol. 21, No. 2, 22.05.2016, p. 150-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adjustment outcomes of immigrant children and youth in Europe

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Dimitrova, Radosveta

AU - Chasiotis, A.

AU - van de Vijver, F.J.R.

PY - 2016/5/22

Y1 - 2016/5/22

N2 - Compared to natives, immigrants have been reported to display either more (migration morbidity) or fewer (immigrant paradox) adjustment problems. We examined these two perspectives using a meta-analysis from 51 studies (N = 224,197), reporting internalizing, externalizing, and academic outcomes among immigrant children and youth in Europe. Overall, migration morbidity was better supported than the immigrant paradox. Migration morbidity was supported for (a) externalizing outcomes in Northern Europe and adolescent samples; (b) academic outcomes for low SES and fewer girls across samples; (c) internalizing outcomes in Western Europe and preadolescent samples. Cultural diversity and long-term residence of immigrants are favorable factors for the paradox in externalizing outcomes, whereas immigrant family reunion was predictive for the paradox in internalizing and academic outcomes. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.

AB - Compared to natives, immigrants have been reported to display either more (migration morbidity) or fewer (immigrant paradox) adjustment problems. We examined these two perspectives using a meta-analysis from 51 studies (N = 224,197), reporting internalizing, externalizing, and academic outcomes among immigrant children and youth in Europe. Overall, migration morbidity was better supported than the immigrant paradox. Migration morbidity was supported for (a) externalizing outcomes in Northern Europe and adolescent samples; (b) academic outcomes for low SES and fewer girls across samples; (c) internalizing outcomes in Western Europe and preadolescent samples. Cultural diversity and long-term residence of immigrants are favorable factors for the paradox in externalizing outcomes, whereas immigrant family reunion was predictive for the paradox in internalizing and academic outcomes. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.

U2 - 10.1027/1016-9040/a000246

DO - 10.1027/1016-9040/a000246

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 150

EP - 162

JO - European Psychologist

JF - European Psychologist

SN - 1016-9040

IS - 2

ER -