Advancing integrated care and its evaluation by means of a universal typology

L. Busetto, K.G. Luijkx, H.J.M. Vrijhoef

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Health systems around the globe implement integrated care interventions to address the Triple Aim of simultaneously improving population health, patient experiences and cost-efficiency. However, the underlying definitions and conceptualisations of integrated care often differ considerably, which makes uniform measurement and comparison difficult. Rather than agreeing on one definition of integrated care, we argue that a universal typology of integrated care interventions should be developed to enable the comparison of interventions that are based on different understandings of integrated care. This universal typology should combine rankable and intangible components with unrankable and tangible sub-components, and be conceptually sound and flexible. The content of the typology should be developed by an international consortium of relevant stakeholders.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-44
JournalInternational Journal of Care Coordination
Volume20
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Cite this

@article{22f77c9a41544eb38789dc4af7edddfa,
title = "Advancing integrated care and its evaluation by means of a universal typology",
abstract = "Health systems around the globe implement integrated care interventions to address the Triple Aim of simultaneously improving population health, patient experiences and cost-efficiency. However, the underlying definitions and conceptualisations of integrated care often differ considerably, which makes uniform measurement and comparison difficult. Rather than agreeing on one definition of integrated care, we argue that a universal typology of integrated care interventions should be developed to enable the comparison of interventions that are based on different understandings of integrated care. This universal typology should combine rankable and intangible components with unrankable and tangible sub-components, and be conceptually sound and flexible. The content of the typology should be developed by an international consortium of relevant stakeholders.",
author = "L. Busetto and K.G. Luijkx and H.J.M. Vrijhoef",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/2053434517705732",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "41--44",
journal = "International Journal of Care Coordination",
issn = "2053-4345",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

Advancing integrated care and its evaluation by means of a universal typology. / Busetto, L.; Luijkx, K.G.; Vrijhoef, H.J.M.

In: International Journal of Care Coordination , Vol. 20, No. 1-2, 06.2017, p. 41-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advancing integrated care and its evaluation by means of a universal typology

AU - Busetto, L.

AU - Luijkx, K.G.

AU - Vrijhoef, H.J.M.

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - Health systems around the globe implement integrated care interventions to address the Triple Aim of simultaneously improving population health, patient experiences and cost-efficiency. However, the underlying definitions and conceptualisations of integrated care often differ considerably, which makes uniform measurement and comparison difficult. Rather than agreeing on one definition of integrated care, we argue that a universal typology of integrated care interventions should be developed to enable the comparison of interventions that are based on different understandings of integrated care. This universal typology should combine rankable and intangible components with unrankable and tangible sub-components, and be conceptually sound and flexible. The content of the typology should be developed by an international consortium of relevant stakeholders.

AB - Health systems around the globe implement integrated care interventions to address the Triple Aim of simultaneously improving population health, patient experiences and cost-efficiency. However, the underlying definitions and conceptualisations of integrated care often differ considerably, which makes uniform measurement and comparison difficult. Rather than agreeing on one definition of integrated care, we argue that a universal typology of integrated care interventions should be developed to enable the comparison of interventions that are based on different understandings of integrated care. This universal typology should combine rankable and intangible components with unrankable and tangible sub-components, and be conceptually sound and flexible. The content of the typology should be developed by an international consortium of relevant stakeholders.

U2 - 10.1177/2053434517705732

DO - 10.1177/2053434517705732

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 41

EP - 44

JO - International Journal of Care Coordination

JF - International Journal of Care Coordination

SN - 2053-4345

IS - 1-2

ER -