Abstract
In this article, it is argued that the distinction between strong and weak formal features can and must be eliminated. I will adopt the derivation-and-evaluation model of grammar, according to which Chomsky's computational system (CHL) functions as a generator which produces candidates that are evaluated in an optimality theoretic manner, and it is shown that the strong/weak distinction can be captured by assuming an interaction between a constraint that disfavors movement (STAY) and a constraint (family) F that requires checking of the formal features. The discussion of Scandinavian Object Shift shows that this is not just a reformulation of the original distinction, but has various desirable empirical consequences. The article concludes with a discussion of Scrambling of the Dutch/German type.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 673-721 |
| Number of pages | 49 |
| Journal | Natural Language & Linguistic Theory |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Against Feature Strength: the Case of Scandinavian Object Shift'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver