TY - JOUR
T1 - Agile work practices
T2 - Measurement and mechanisms
AU - Junker, Tom L.
AU - Bakker, Arnold B.
AU - Derks, Daantje
AU - Molenaar, Dylan
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Organizations increasingly follow agile management frameworks (e.g., Scrum), to implement practices that aim to enable continuous change. Currently, it is unclear how agile work practices (AWPs) are best conceptualized and measured. The present study draws from the taskwork-teamwork distinction to develop a new theoretical framework and measurement instrument of AWPs. We outline potential mechanisms of AWPs in terms of (a) temporality, (b) managerial control, (c) team processes, and (d) work design. Based on this framework, we validate measures of agile practices with data collected from 269 different teams, including multisource and multiwave data (n = 1664 observations). We first establish the factorial validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement invariance of the instrument. Subsequently, we show that AWPs diverge from centralized bureaucracy and converge with measures of emergent team planning, autonomy, and feedback. The pattern of relationships with variables in the nomological network supports the taskwork-teamwork model. Results of multilevel regression analyses indicate that the use of AWPs is associated with favorable team planning behaviors and enriched work design experiences. By disentangling the AWP concept from software development and popular management frameworks, this study broadens the scope of research on agility.
AB - Organizations increasingly follow agile management frameworks (e.g., Scrum), to implement practices that aim to enable continuous change. Currently, it is unclear how agile work practices (AWPs) are best conceptualized and measured. The present study draws from the taskwork-teamwork distinction to develop a new theoretical framework and measurement instrument of AWPs. We outline potential mechanisms of AWPs in terms of (a) temporality, (b) managerial control, (c) team processes, and (d) work design. Based on this framework, we validate measures of agile practices with data collected from 269 different teams, including multisource and multiwave data (n = 1664 observations). We first establish the factorial validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement invariance of the instrument. Subsequently, we show that AWPs diverge from centralized bureaucracy and converge with measures of emergent team planning, autonomy, and feedback. The pattern of relationships with variables in the nomological network supports the taskwork-teamwork model. Results of multilevel regression analyses indicate that the use of AWPs is associated with favorable team planning behaviors and enriched work design experiences. By disentangling the AWP concept from software development and popular management frameworks, this study broadens the scope of research on agility.
KW - Agile work practices
KW - scale development
KW - team processes
KW - work design
KW - bureaucracy
KW - agility
KW - agile practices
KW - agile teams
KW - EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS
KW - OF-FIT INDEXES
KW - SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT
KW - TEAM KNOWLEDGE
KW - MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE
KW - JOB-SATISFACTION
KW - PERFORMANCE
KW - ROUTINES
KW - MODEL
KW - TIME
UR - https://app-eu.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=10118&lang=en_us&readclass=rs_readArea&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1080%2F1359432X.2022.2096439
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133827110&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1359432X.2022.2096439
DO - 10.1080/1359432X.2022.2096439
M3 - Article
SN - 1359-432X
VL - 32
SP - 1
EP - 22
JO - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
JF - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
IS - 1
ER -