Aligning national “logics” in a European military helicopter program

D.J.W.B. Uiterwijk, J.M.M.L. Soeters, P.C. van Fenema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article analyzes the public side of the NH90 network consisting of four participating countries (Germany, France, Italy, and the Netherlands) and their industrial partners. Comparable to observations in earlier international projects in the defense sector, the development and production of the NH90 defense helicopter did not match original plans and costs estimates. On the basis of four mechanisms that were intended to facilitate the cooperation between the partnering countries (the General Memorandum of Understanding; coalition formation; the role of the central agency; and the process of vertical escalation) the question is posed whether or not there was a true alignment of national interests and “logics.” The lack of standardization, as well as program delays and issues concerning the division of the work-share, lead to the emerging alignment being characterized as “quasi-alignment” at best.
Keywords: weapon programs, international cooperation, networks, defense procurement, alignment, “logics”


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-67
JournalDefense & Security Analysis
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Military
coalition formation
memorandum
escalation
international cooperation
weapon
Italy
Netherlands
standardization
France
lack
costs
programme
alignment
cost
defence

Cite this

Uiterwijk, D.J.W.B. ; Soeters, J.M.M.L. ; van Fenema, P.C. / Aligning national “logics” in a European military helicopter program. In: Defense & Security Analysis. 2013 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 54-67.
@article{543a2f156def4b1b9871e4ceb2c8ef6b,
title = "Aligning national “logics” in a European military helicopter program",
abstract = "This article analyzes the public side of the NH90 network consisting of four participating countries (Germany, France, Italy, and the Netherlands) and their industrial partners. Comparable to observations in earlier international projects in the defense sector, the development and production of the NH90 defense helicopter did not match original plans and costs estimates. On the basis of four mechanisms that were intended to facilitate the cooperation between the partnering countries (the General Memorandum of Understanding; coalition formation; the role of the central agency; and the process of vertical escalation) the question is posed whether or not there was a true alignment of national interests and “logics.” The lack of standardization, as well as program delays and issues concerning the division of the work-share, lead to the emerging alignment being characterized as “quasi-alignment” at best.Keywords: weapon programs, international cooperation, networks, defense procurement, alignment, “logics”",
author = "D.J.W.B. Uiterwijk and J.M.M.L. Soeters and {van Fenema}, P.C.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/14751798.2013.760248",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "54--67",
journal = "Defense & Security Analysis",
issn = "1475-1798",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Aligning national “logics” in a European military helicopter program. / Uiterwijk, D.J.W.B.; Soeters, J.M.M.L.; van Fenema, P.C.

In: Defense & Security Analysis, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2013, p. 54-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning national “logics” in a European military helicopter program

AU - Uiterwijk, D.J.W.B.

AU - Soeters, J.M.M.L.

AU - van Fenema, P.C.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article analyzes the public side of the NH90 network consisting of four participating countries (Germany, France, Italy, and the Netherlands) and their industrial partners. Comparable to observations in earlier international projects in the defense sector, the development and production of the NH90 defense helicopter did not match original plans and costs estimates. On the basis of four mechanisms that were intended to facilitate the cooperation between the partnering countries (the General Memorandum of Understanding; coalition formation; the role of the central agency; and the process of vertical escalation) the question is posed whether or not there was a true alignment of national interests and “logics.” The lack of standardization, as well as program delays and issues concerning the division of the work-share, lead to the emerging alignment being characterized as “quasi-alignment” at best.Keywords: weapon programs, international cooperation, networks, defense procurement, alignment, “logics”

AB - This article analyzes the public side of the NH90 network consisting of four participating countries (Germany, France, Italy, and the Netherlands) and their industrial partners. Comparable to observations in earlier international projects in the defense sector, the development and production of the NH90 defense helicopter did not match original plans and costs estimates. On the basis of four mechanisms that were intended to facilitate the cooperation between the partnering countries (the General Memorandum of Understanding; coalition formation; the role of the central agency; and the process of vertical escalation) the question is posed whether or not there was a true alignment of national interests and “logics.” The lack of standardization, as well as program delays and issues concerning the division of the work-share, lead to the emerging alignment being characterized as “quasi-alignment” at best.Keywords: weapon programs, international cooperation, networks, defense procurement, alignment, “logics”

U2 - 10.1080/14751798.2013.760248

DO - 10.1080/14751798.2013.760248

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 54

EP - 67

JO - Defense & Security Analysis

JF - Defense & Security Analysis

SN - 1475-1798

IS - 1

ER -