All employees are equal, but some are more equal than others: Dominance, agreeableness, and status inconsistency among men and women

M. Biron, R.S.M. de Reuver, S. Toker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Status inconsistency is a situation in which there is an objective or subjective mismatch between, for example, a person’s education and his/her income. This mismatch may transform into status enhancement, wherein rewards exceed one’s human capital, or into status detraction, wherein one’s human capital exceeds one’s rewards. Although status inconsistency affects employees’ attitudes and behaviours, little is known about individual differences in this variable. The current study investigates whether the relationships of agreeableness and dominance—with objective and subjective status inconsistency vary by gender. We analysed objective and subjective input and return statuses among a sample of 375 employees. We found that men who expressed a gender-non-congruent trait, namely agreeableness, experienced an objective backlash effect compared with dominant men, whereas women who expressed a gender-non-congruent trait, namely dominance, did not experience a backlash effect compared with agreeable women. In addition, our results show that agreeable employees, both men and women, perceive themselves as status-enhanced when in fact they are not. Finally, we show that objective status inconsistency mediates the relationships of agreeableness and dominance with subjective status inconsistency.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)430-446
JournalThe European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Individuality
Education
Agreeableness
Employees
Inconsistency
Reward
Human capital
Mismatch
Employee attitudes
Employee behaviour
Income
Enhancement
Individual differences

Cite this

@article{bd15fbeefc1c48708faa5de4da5086fc,
title = "All employees are equal, but some are more equal than others: Dominance, agreeableness, and status inconsistency among men and women",
abstract = "Status inconsistency is a situation in which there is an objective or subjective mismatch between, for example, a person’s education and his/her income. This mismatch may transform into status enhancement, wherein rewards exceed one’s human capital, or into status detraction, wherein one’s human capital exceeds one’s rewards. Although status inconsistency affects employees’ attitudes and behaviours, little is known about individual differences in this variable. The current study investigates whether the relationships of agreeableness and dominance—with objective and subjective status inconsistency vary by gender. We analysed objective and subjective input and return statuses among a sample of 375 employees. We found that men who expressed a gender-non-congruent trait, namely agreeableness, experienced an objective backlash effect compared with dominant men, whereas women who expressed a gender-non-congruent trait, namely dominance, did not experience a backlash effect compared with agreeable women. In addition, our results show that agreeable employees, both men and women, perceive themselves as status-enhanced when in fact they are not. Finally, we show that objective status inconsistency mediates the relationships of agreeableness and dominance with subjective status inconsistency.",
author = "M. Biron and {de Reuver}, R.S.M. and S. Toker",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/1359432X.2015.1111338",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "430--446",
journal = "The European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology",
issn = "1359-432X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

All employees are equal, but some are more equal than others : Dominance, agreeableness, and status inconsistency among men and women. / Biron, M.; de Reuver, R.S.M.; Toker, S.

In: The European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2016, p. 430-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - All employees are equal, but some are more equal than others

T2 - Dominance, agreeableness, and status inconsistency among men and women

AU - Biron, M.

AU - de Reuver, R.S.M.

AU - Toker, S.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Status inconsistency is a situation in which there is an objective or subjective mismatch between, for example, a person’s education and his/her income. This mismatch may transform into status enhancement, wherein rewards exceed one’s human capital, or into status detraction, wherein one’s human capital exceeds one’s rewards. Although status inconsistency affects employees’ attitudes and behaviours, little is known about individual differences in this variable. The current study investigates whether the relationships of agreeableness and dominance—with objective and subjective status inconsistency vary by gender. We analysed objective and subjective input and return statuses among a sample of 375 employees. We found that men who expressed a gender-non-congruent trait, namely agreeableness, experienced an objective backlash effect compared with dominant men, whereas women who expressed a gender-non-congruent trait, namely dominance, did not experience a backlash effect compared with agreeable women. In addition, our results show that agreeable employees, both men and women, perceive themselves as status-enhanced when in fact they are not. Finally, we show that objective status inconsistency mediates the relationships of agreeableness and dominance with subjective status inconsistency.

AB - Status inconsistency is a situation in which there is an objective or subjective mismatch between, for example, a person’s education and his/her income. This mismatch may transform into status enhancement, wherein rewards exceed one’s human capital, or into status detraction, wherein one’s human capital exceeds one’s rewards. Although status inconsistency affects employees’ attitudes and behaviours, little is known about individual differences in this variable. The current study investigates whether the relationships of agreeableness and dominance—with objective and subjective status inconsistency vary by gender. We analysed objective and subjective input and return statuses among a sample of 375 employees. We found that men who expressed a gender-non-congruent trait, namely agreeableness, experienced an objective backlash effect compared with dominant men, whereas women who expressed a gender-non-congruent trait, namely dominance, did not experience a backlash effect compared with agreeable women. In addition, our results show that agreeable employees, both men and women, perceive themselves as status-enhanced when in fact they are not. Finally, we show that objective status inconsistency mediates the relationships of agreeableness and dominance with subjective status inconsistency.

U2 - 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1111338

DO - 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1111338

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 430

EP - 446

JO - The European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

JF - The European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

SN - 1359-432X

IS - 3

ER -