Als een roepende in de woestijn? Over God spreken in deze tijd

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    17 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article offers a critical analysis of some contemporary attempts to bring up the issue of God and religion again in philosophical discourse, after the disenchantment of the project of Enlightenment. At first the author analyses G. Vattimo’s recent book Belief, in which he repudiates the violence and oppression of technically manipulating and politically controlling reason. In order to put an end to this violence, Vattimo argues in favour of a complete historicisation and secularisation of Christianity, which has caritas as its limit. The author criticises Vattimo on the point that his thinking leads to a subjectivation of religion and truth, and therefore is unable to stop the violence of reason. Secondly, Ch. Taylor’s interpretation of the malaise of modernity is analysed. He considers Christianity as a safeguard of the intrinsically good and true, which enables contemporary thinking to overcome its subjectivism. As a conclusion, the author stresses the importance of the religious idea of irreducible transcendence as confining the violence of self-willed thinking.
    Original languageDutch
    Pages (from-to)326-342
    JournalNederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift
    Volume54
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Cite this

    @article{8e0bc16989254a7aa090bddc2d1e597f,
    title = "Als een roepende in de woestijn?: Over God spreken in deze tijd",
    abstract = "This article offers a critical analysis of some contemporary attempts to bring up the issue of God and religion again in philosophical discourse, after the disenchantment of the project of Enlightenment. At first the author analyses G. Vattimo’s recent book Belief, in which he repudiates the violence and oppression of technically manipulating and politically controlling reason. In order to put an end to this violence, Vattimo argues in favour of a complete historicisation and secularisation of Christianity, which has caritas as its limit. The author criticises Vattimo on the point that his thinking leads to a subjectivation of religion and truth, and therefore is unable to stop the violence of reason. Secondly, Ch. Taylor’s interpretation of the malaise of modernity is analysed. He considers Christianity as a safeguard of the intrinsically good and true, which enables contemporary thinking to overcome its subjectivism. As a conclusion, the author stresses the importance of the religious idea of irreducible transcendence as confining the violence of self-willed thinking.",
    author = "P.H.A.I. Jonkers",
    year = "2000",
    language = "Dutch",
    volume = "54",
    pages = "326--342",
    journal = "Nederlands Theologisch tijdschrift",
    issn = "0028-212x",

    }

    Als een roepende in de woestijn? Over God spreken in deze tijd. / Jonkers, P.H.A.I.

    In: Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift, Vol. 54, 2000, p. 326-342.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Als een roepende in de woestijn?

    T2 - Over God spreken in deze tijd

    AU - Jonkers, P.H.A.I.

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - This article offers a critical analysis of some contemporary attempts to bring up the issue of God and religion again in philosophical discourse, after the disenchantment of the project of Enlightenment. At first the author analyses G. Vattimo’s recent book Belief, in which he repudiates the violence and oppression of technically manipulating and politically controlling reason. In order to put an end to this violence, Vattimo argues in favour of a complete historicisation and secularisation of Christianity, which has caritas as its limit. The author criticises Vattimo on the point that his thinking leads to a subjectivation of religion and truth, and therefore is unable to stop the violence of reason. Secondly, Ch. Taylor’s interpretation of the malaise of modernity is analysed. He considers Christianity as a safeguard of the intrinsically good and true, which enables contemporary thinking to overcome its subjectivism. As a conclusion, the author stresses the importance of the religious idea of irreducible transcendence as confining the violence of self-willed thinking.

    AB - This article offers a critical analysis of some contemporary attempts to bring up the issue of God and religion again in philosophical discourse, after the disenchantment of the project of Enlightenment. At first the author analyses G. Vattimo’s recent book Belief, in which he repudiates the violence and oppression of technically manipulating and politically controlling reason. In order to put an end to this violence, Vattimo argues in favour of a complete historicisation and secularisation of Christianity, which has caritas as its limit. The author criticises Vattimo on the point that his thinking leads to a subjectivation of religion and truth, and therefore is unable to stop the violence of reason. Secondly, Ch. Taylor’s interpretation of the malaise of modernity is analysed. He considers Christianity as a safeguard of the intrinsically good and true, which enables contemporary thinking to overcome its subjectivism. As a conclusion, the author stresses the importance of the religious idea of irreducible transcendence as confining the violence of self-willed thinking.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 54

    SP - 326

    EP - 342

    JO - Nederlands Theologisch tijdschrift

    JF - Nederlands Theologisch tijdschrift

    SN - 0028-212x

    ER -