Ambition is nothing without focus: Compensating for negative transfer of experience in R&D

A. Ghosh, Xavier Martin, J.M. Pennings, F.C. Wezel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Organizations create high-impact inventions when they combine disparate strands of technology in their corporate research and development. We theorize that when undertaking complex inventive search characterized by high breadth, i.e., drawing on multiple diverse technology components, an organization’s propensity toward high-impact inventions depends on its stock of experience with recombining such components and on the focus of its inventive search. Building on learning transfer theory, we argue that the complexity and causal ambiguity of higher-breadth projects is such that experience with similar inventive search will be a poorer guide, comparatively reducing their inventive impact; however, this negative effect can be attenuated by the degree of focus of an organization’s contemporaneous inventive search. Using a longitudinal data set of patents from the photographic imaging industry, we find support for our predictions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)572-590
Number of pages19
JournalOrganization Science
Volume25
Issue number2
Early online date17 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Patents and inventions
Imaging techniques
Industry
Invention
Imaging
Learning transfer
Prediction
Longitudinal data
Causal ambiguity
Propensity
Patents

Keywords

  • Technology recombination
  • Organizational learning
  • Organizational inventive focus
  • Patent citations
  • Photographic imaging industry

Cite this

@article{bb79fb3507e9462980b58a27a9e5d29d,
title = "Ambition is nothing without focus: Compensating for negative transfer of experience in R&D",
abstract = "Organizations create high-impact inventions when they combine disparate strands of technology in their corporate research and development. We theorize that when undertaking complex inventive search characterized by high breadth, i.e., drawing on multiple diverse technology components, an organization’s propensity toward high-impact inventions depends on its stock of experience with recombining such components and on the focus of its inventive search. Building on learning transfer theory, we argue that the complexity and causal ambiguity of higher-breadth projects is such that experience with similar inventive search will be a poorer guide, comparatively reducing their inventive impact; however, this negative effect can be attenuated by the degree of focus of an organization’s contemporaneous inventive search. Using a longitudinal data set of patents from the photographic imaging industry, we find support for our predictions.",
keywords = "Technology recombination, Organizational learning, Organizational inventive focus, Patent citations, Photographic imaging industry",
author = "A. Ghosh and Xavier Martin and J.M. Pennings and F.C. Wezel",
note = "Ghosh, Anindya, Xavier Martin, Johannes M. Pennings and Filippo C. Wezel. 2014. “Ambition is nothing without focus: Compensating for negative transfer of experience in R&D.” Organization Science, volume 25 issue 2, pp. 572-590.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1287/orsc.2013.0845",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "572--590",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
publisher = "INFORMS",
number = "2",

}

Ambition is nothing without focus : Compensating for negative transfer of experience in R&D . / Ghosh, A.; Martin, Xavier; Pennings, J.M.; Wezel, F.C.

In: Organization Science, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2014, p. 572-590.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambition is nothing without focus

T2 - Compensating for negative transfer of experience in R&D

AU - Ghosh, A.

AU - Martin, Xavier

AU - Pennings, J.M.

AU - Wezel, F.C.

N1 - Ghosh, Anindya, Xavier Martin, Johannes M. Pennings and Filippo C. Wezel. 2014. “Ambition is nothing without focus: Compensating for negative transfer of experience in R&D.” Organization Science, volume 25 issue 2, pp. 572-590.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Organizations create high-impact inventions when they combine disparate strands of technology in their corporate research and development. We theorize that when undertaking complex inventive search characterized by high breadth, i.e., drawing on multiple diverse technology components, an organization’s propensity toward high-impact inventions depends on its stock of experience with recombining such components and on the focus of its inventive search. Building on learning transfer theory, we argue that the complexity and causal ambiguity of higher-breadth projects is such that experience with similar inventive search will be a poorer guide, comparatively reducing their inventive impact; however, this negative effect can be attenuated by the degree of focus of an organization’s contemporaneous inventive search. Using a longitudinal data set of patents from the photographic imaging industry, we find support for our predictions.

AB - Organizations create high-impact inventions when they combine disparate strands of technology in their corporate research and development. We theorize that when undertaking complex inventive search characterized by high breadth, i.e., drawing on multiple diverse technology components, an organization’s propensity toward high-impact inventions depends on its stock of experience with recombining such components and on the focus of its inventive search. Building on learning transfer theory, we argue that the complexity and causal ambiguity of higher-breadth projects is such that experience with similar inventive search will be a poorer guide, comparatively reducing their inventive impact; however, this negative effect can be attenuated by the degree of focus of an organization’s contemporaneous inventive search. Using a longitudinal data set of patents from the photographic imaging industry, we find support for our predictions.

KW - Technology recombination

KW - Organizational learning

KW - Organizational inventive focus

KW - Patent citations

KW - Photographic imaging industry

U2 - 10.1287/orsc.2013.0845

DO - 10.1287/orsc.2013.0845

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 572

EP - 590

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 2

ER -