An EU competition law analysis of online display advertising in the programmatic age

Damien Geradin, Dimitrios Katsifis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Online display advertising represents a large source of revenues for online publishers. Because of its vital importance for publishers and advertisers, competition in the advertising ecosystem is desirable. Yet, in the “programmatic” era, the sector is characterized by a high degree of opacity and some of its segments seem to be dominated by Google, with concerns being expressed that it may engage in anti-competitive strategies. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to explore the display advertising ecosystem and discuss relevant competition law issues. It first discusses market definitions and shows that Google may be dominant on several ad tech markets and then describes how programmatic advertising functions in practice. Finally, the paper identifies several practices which may amount to abuse of a dominant position in breach of Article 102 TFEU.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-96
Number of pages42
JournalEuropean Competition Journal
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

EU
Law
search engine
market
revenue
abuse
Competition law
Online advertising
Google
Ecosystem
Breach
Opacity
Abuse
Revenue
Market definition
Competitive strategy

Keywords

  • Online advertising
  • display advertising
  • advertisers
  • publishers
  • auctions
  • ad exchange
  • header bidding
  • AMP
  • ad tech
  • big data
  • Google
  • competition law
  • abuses of a dominant position
  • exploitation
  • vertical foreclosure
  • self-preferencing

Cite this

@article{7164df28eb52442ca38f7b25328ee6d2,
title = "An EU competition law analysis of online display advertising in the programmatic age",
abstract = "Online display advertising represents a large source of revenues for online publishers. Because of its vital importance for publishers and advertisers, competition in the advertising ecosystem is desirable. Yet, in the “programmatic” era, the sector is characterized by a high degree of opacity and some of its segments seem to be dominated by Google, with concerns being expressed that it may engage in anti-competitive strategies. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to explore the display advertising ecosystem and discuss relevant competition law issues. It first discusses market definitions and shows that Google may be dominant on several ad tech markets and then describes how programmatic advertising functions in practice. Finally, the paper identifies several practices which may amount to abuse of a dominant position in breach of Article 102 TFEU.",
keywords = "Online advertising, display advertising, advertisers, publishers, auctions, ad exchange, header bidding, AMP, ad tech, big data, Google, competition law, abuses of a dominant position, exploitation, vertical foreclosure, self-preferencing",
author = "Damien Geradin and Dimitrios Katsifis",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/17441056.2019.1574440",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "55--96",
journal = "European Competition Journal",
issn = "1744-1056",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

An EU competition law analysis of online display advertising in the programmatic age. / Geradin, Damien; Katsifis, Dimitrios.

In: European Competition Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 04.02.2019, p. 55-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An EU competition law analysis of online display advertising in the programmatic age

AU - Geradin, Damien

AU - Katsifis, Dimitrios

PY - 2019/2/4

Y1 - 2019/2/4

N2 - Online display advertising represents a large source of revenues for online publishers. Because of its vital importance for publishers and advertisers, competition in the advertising ecosystem is desirable. Yet, in the “programmatic” era, the sector is characterized by a high degree of opacity and some of its segments seem to be dominated by Google, with concerns being expressed that it may engage in anti-competitive strategies. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to explore the display advertising ecosystem and discuss relevant competition law issues. It first discusses market definitions and shows that Google may be dominant on several ad tech markets and then describes how programmatic advertising functions in practice. Finally, the paper identifies several practices which may amount to abuse of a dominant position in breach of Article 102 TFEU.

AB - Online display advertising represents a large source of revenues for online publishers. Because of its vital importance for publishers and advertisers, competition in the advertising ecosystem is desirable. Yet, in the “programmatic” era, the sector is characterized by a high degree of opacity and some of its segments seem to be dominated by Google, with concerns being expressed that it may engage in anti-competitive strategies. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to explore the display advertising ecosystem and discuss relevant competition law issues. It first discusses market definitions and shows that Google may be dominant on several ad tech markets and then describes how programmatic advertising functions in practice. Finally, the paper identifies several practices which may amount to abuse of a dominant position in breach of Article 102 TFEU.

KW - Online advertising

KW - display advertising

KW - advertisers

KW - publishers

KW - auctions

KW - ad exchange

KW - header bidding

KW - AMP

KW - ad tech

KW - big data

KW - Google

KW - competition law

KW - abuses of a dominant position

KW - exploitation

KW - vertical foreclosure

KW - self-preferencing

U2 - 10.1080/17441056.2019.1574440

DO - 10.1080/17441056.2019.1574440

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 55

EP - 96

JO - European Competition Journal

JF - European Competition Journal

SN - 1744-1056

IS - 1

ER -