An item response theory analysis of two frequently used measures of identity development

S. K. Johnson*, E. L. de Moor, J. M. Chung, L. den Boer, T. A. Klimstra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
211 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Identity development—exploring options and making commitments—is an important process related to human functioning across the lifespan. An accurate understanding of identity development processes requires precise measures, but commonly used questionnaires have not been subject to intensive psychometric analyses. We investigated the psychometric properties of two such measures, the Utrecht Management of Identity Commitments Scale and the Dimensions of Identity Development Scale. Previous analyses have treated the response scales as interval rather than ordinal, which may not be reasonable given the measures’ Likert-type response scales. Accordingly, we evaluated their measurement precision by conducting multidimensional item response theory analyses of data from six studies of secondary and postsecondary students in The Netherlands and the United States (total N = 4,844; 36.00% boys/men, 63.07% girls/women; 0.02% nonbinary or missing gender data; 62.39% completed the measure in Dutch, 37.61% in English; 52.66% postsecondary school; 47.34% secondary school; racial, ethnic, and nationality information varied across studies). Graded response models showed that a limited range of the latent attributes was precisely measured, and the quality of items varied considerably. The measures functioned mostly similarly between gender groups, but there was substantial differential item functioning based on school level and language of the measure. We originally sought to create shortened versions, but the shortened versions provided no improvement over the low quality of the longer versions. Our analyses suggest that reflection on what these identity processes entail is needed, to develop new items that address different manifestations of the attributes under consideration.

Impact Statement
This study evaluated two measures of identity development among adolescents and young adults in the United States and The Netherlands. We examined how responses to questions related to identity dimensions (e.g., exploration) and whether that differed based on the language the measure was given in or the gender or school level of the participant. Questions measure identity processes similarly across gender groups but differently based on school level and language.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1047–1061
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume34
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • ADOLESCENCE
  • ASSOCIATIONS
  • COMMITMENT
  • EXPLORATION
  • FRAMEWORK
  • MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE
  • MODEL
  • PRELIMINARY VALIDATION
  • SCALE U-MICS
  • UTRECHT-MANAGEMENT
  • graded response model
  • identity development
  • item response theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An item response theory analysis of two frequently used measures of identity development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this