An unconditional basic income? How Dutch citizens justify their opinions about a basic income and work conditionality

Federica Rossetti*, Femke Roosma, Tijs Laenen, Koen Abts

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The article focuses on one of the core but controversial features of a universal basic income (UBI): its unconditionality. Using qualitative in-depth interviews collected in the Dutch municipality of Tilburg in 2018–2019, we examine the arguments underlying popular opinions about a UBI and work conditionality. The analysis suggests that these arguments can be interpreted from two theoretical perspectives. On the one hand, respondents make frequent use of deservingness criteria referring to the characteristics of welfare recipients, such as their need and work willingness. On the other hand, they justify their opinions using arguments related to the characteristics of welfare schemes, such as their administrative and financial feasibility. Our findings offer important insights concerning political actors who support (or oppose) the real-world implementation of a UBI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-300
JournalJournal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Basic income
  • in-depth interviews
  • public opinion
  • the Netherlands
  • work conditionality

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An unconditional basic income? How Dutch citizens justify their opinions about a basic income and work conditionality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this