Analogy Comprehension as Complexity Reduction

B.M.J. van Klink

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

    Abstract

    In this paper we try to find an explanation for the interesting phenomenon that competent langugage users have little difficulty understanding non-trivial metaphors in ordinary discours. According to the standard interaction view, in metaphor commonplaces associated with the vehicle are projected on the topic. This account has to be dismissed as too general (when not untrue in several cases). On the basis of an elaborated theory of similarity we propose an alternative, more precise, model for analogy comprehesion. This model involves a systematic reduction of complexity in three stages: in stage one the relevant (manifest, specific, and ordinary) features of the vehicle are selected. In stage two we investigate which of these can be meaningfully applied to the topic. Generally, this will reduce even further the set of possible relevant features. The last stage has an important control function: we check whether the remaining set of features makes sense within the linguistic context in which the metaphor occurs. In the light of new data, we may be forced to delete (some of) the features found in stage two and replace them by new ones. By means of this model we are able to reconstruct logically the functioning of metaphors as well as other types of analogy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)189-207
    Number of pages19
    JournalActa Linguistica Hungarica
    Volume42
    Issue number3/4
    Publication statusPublished - 1996

    Fingerprint

    metaphor
    comprehension
    linguistics
    interaction

    Cite this

    van Klink, B. M. J. (1996). Analogy Comprehension as Complexity Reduction. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 42(3/4), 189-207.
    van Klink, B.M.J. / Analogy Comprehension as Complexity Reduction. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica. 1996 ; Vol. 42, No. 3/4. pp. 189-207.
    @article{a0dba39736bc40a4a930ada2c8980685,
    title = "Analogy Comprehension as Complexity Reduction",
    abstract = "In this paper we try to find an explanation for the interesting phenomenon that competent langugage users have little difficulty understanding non-trivial metaphors in ordinary discours. According to the standard interaction view, in metaphor commonplaces associated with the vehicle are projected on the topic. This account has to be dismissed as too general (when not untrue in several cases). On the basis of an elaborated theory of similarity we propose an alternative, more precise, model for analogy comprehesion. This model involves a systematic reduction of complexity in three stages: in stage one the relevant (manifest, specific, and ordinary) features of the vehicle are selected. In stage two we investigate which of these can be meaningfully applied to the topic. Generally, this will reduce even further the set of possible relevant features. The last stage has an important control function: we check whether the remaining set of features makes sense within the linguistic context in which the metaphor occurs. In the light of new data, we may be forced to delete (some of) the features found in stage two and replace them by new ones. By means of this model we are able to reconstruct logically the functioning of metaphors as well as other types of analogy.",
    author = "{van Klink}, B.M.J.",
    note = "Pagination: 19",
    year = "1996",
    language = "English",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "189--207",
    journal = "Acta Linguistica Hungarica",
    issn = "1216-8076",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "3/4",

    }

    van Klink, BMJ 1996, 'Analogy Comprehension as Complexity Reduction', Acta Linguistica Hungarica, vol. 42, no. 3/4, pp. 189-207.

    Analogy Comprehension as Complexity Reduction. / van Klink, B.M.J.

    In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica, Vol. 42, No. 3/4, 1996, p. 189-207.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Analogy Comprehension as Complexity Reduction

    AU - van Klink, B.M.J.

    N1 - Pagination: 19

    PY - 1996

    Y1 - 1996

    N2 - In this paper we try to find an explanation for the interesting phenomenon that competent langugage users have little difficulty understanding non-trivial metaphors in ordinary discours. According to the standard interaction view, in metaphor commonplaces associated with the vehicle are projected on the topic. This account has to be dismissed as too general (when not untrue in several cases). On the basis of an elaborated theory of similarity we propose an alternative, more precise, model for analogy comprehesion. This model involves a systematic reduction of complexity in three stages: in stage one the relevant (manifest, specific, and ordinary) features of the vehicle are selected. In stage two we investigate which of these can be meaningfully applied to the topic. Generally, this will reduce even further the set of possible relevant features. The last stage has an important control function: we check whether the remaining set of features makes sense within the linguistic context in which the metaphor occurs. In the light of new data, we may be forced to delete (some of) the features found in stage two and replace them by new ones. By means of this model we are able to reconstruct logically the functioning of metaphors as well as other types of analogy.

    AB - In this paper we try to find an explanation for the interesting phenomenon that competent langugage users have little difficulty understanding non-trivial metaphors in ordinary discours. According to the standard interaction view, in metaphor commonplaces associated with the vehicle are projected on the topic. This account has to be dismissed as too general (when not untrue in several cases). On the basis of an elaborated theory of similarity we propose an alternative, more precise, model for analogy comprehesion. This model involves a systematic reduction of complexity in three stages: in stage one the relevant (manifest, specific, and ordinary) features of the vehicle are selected. In stage two we investigate which of these can be meaningfully applied to the topic. Generally, this will reduce even further the set of possible relevant features. The last stage has an important control function: we check whether the remaining set of features makes sense within the linguistic context in which the metaphor occurs. In the light of new data, we may be forced to delete (some of) the features found in stage two and replace them by new ones. By means of this model we are able to reconstruct logically the functioning of metaphors as well as other types of analogy.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 42

    SP - 189

    EP - 207

    JO - Acta Linguistica Hungarica

    JF - Acta Linguistica Hungarica

    SN - 1216-8076

    IS - 3/4

    ER -