Analysis and test of laws for backward (metacontrast) masking

Gregory Francis, Mark Rothmayer, Frouke Hermens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In backward visual masking, it is common to find that the mask has its biggest effect when it follows the target by several tens of milliseconds. Research in the 1960s and 1970s suggested that masking effects were best characterized by the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the target and mask. In particular, one claim has been that the SOA for which masking is optimal remains fixed, even as target and mask durations varied. Experimental evidence supported this claim, and it was accepted as an SOA law. However, recent modeling (Francis, 1997) and experimental studies (Macknik and Livingstone, 1998) argued for new ISI (interstimulus interval) and STA (stimulus termination asynchrony) laws, respectively. This paper reports a mathematical analysis and experimental tests of the laws. The mathematical analysis demonstrates unsuspected relationships between the laws. The experiments test the predictions of the SOA, ISI, and STA laws. The data favor the ISI law over the SOA and the STA laws.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-85
Number of pages23
JournalSpatial vision
Volume17
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cognition/physiology
  • Humans
  • Mathematics
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology
  • Perceptual Masking/physiology
  • Visual Perception/physiology

Cite this

Francis, G., Rothmayer, M., & Hermens, F. (2004). Analysis and test of laws for backward (metacontrast) masking. Spatial vision, 17(3), 163-85.
Francis, Gregory ; Rothmayer, Mark ; Hermens, Frouke. / Analysis and test of laws for backward (metacontrast) masking. In: Spatial vision. 2004 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 163-85.
@article{bfb3ff95fb4e4dddb33c3bd58467e058,
title = "Analysis and test of laws for backward (metacontrast) masking",
abstract = "In backward visual masking, it is common to find that the mask has its biggest effect when it follows the target by several tens of milliseconds. Research in the 1960s and 1970s suggested that masking effects were best characterized by the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the target and mask. In particular, one claim has been that the SOA for which masking is optimal remains fixed, even as target and mask durations varied. Experimental evidence supported this claim, and it was accepted as an SOA law. However, recent modeling (Francis, 1997) and experimental studies (Macknik and Livingstone, 1998) argued for new ISI (interstimulus interval) and STA (stimulus termination asynchrony) laws, respectively. This paper reports a mathematical analysis and experimental tests of the laws. The mathematical analysis demonstrates unsuspected relationships between the laws. The experiments test the predictions of the SOA, ISI, and STA laws. The data favor the ISI law over the SOA and the STA laws.",
keywords = "Cognition/physiology, Humans, Mathematics, Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology, Perceptual Masking/physiology, Visual Perception/physiology",
author = "Gregory Francis and Mark Rothmayer and Frouke Hermens",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "163--85",
journal = "Spatial vision",
issn = "0169-1015",
publisher = "VSP BV",
number = "3",

}

Francis, G, Rothmayer, M & Hermens, F 2004, 'Analysis and test of laws for backward (metacontrast) masking', Spatial vision, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 163-85.

Analysis and test of laws for backward (metacontrast) masking. / Francis, Gregory; Rothmayer, Mark; Hermens, Frouke.

In: Spatial vision, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2004, p. 163-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis and test of laws for backward (metacontrast) masking

AU - Francis, Gregory

AU - Rothmayer, Mark

AU - Hermens, Frouke

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - In backward visual masking, it is common to find that the mask has its biggest effect when it follows the target by several tens of milliseconds. Research in the 1960s and 1970s suggested that masking effects were best characterized by the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the target and mask. In particular, one claim has been that the SOA for which masking is optimal remains fixed, even as target and mask durations varied. Experimental evidence supported this claim, and it was accepted as an SOA law. However, recent modeling (Francis, 1997) and experimental studies (Macknik and Livingstone, 1998) argued for new ISI (interstimulus interval) and STA (stimulus termination asynchrony) laws, respectively. This paper reports a mathematical analysis and experimental tests of the laws. The mathematical analysis demonstrates unsuspected relationships between the laws. The experiments test the predictions of the SOA, ISI, and STA laws. The data favor the ISI law over the SOA and the STA laws.

AB - In backward visual masking, it is common to find that the mask has its biggest effect when it follows the target by several tens of milliseconds. Research in the 1960s and 1970s suggested that masking effects were best characterized by the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the target and mask. In particular, one claim has been that the SOA for which masking is optimal remains fixed, even as target and mask durations varied. Experimental evidence supported this claim, and it was accepted as an SOA law. However, recent modeling (Francis, 1997) and experimental studies (Macknik and Livingstone, 1998) argued for new ISI (interstimulus interval) and STA (stimulus termination asynchrony) laws, respectively. This paper reports a mathematical analysis and experimental tests of the laws. The mathematical analysis demonstrates unsuspected relationships between the laws. The experiments test the predictions of the SOA, ISI, and STA laws. The data favor the ISI law over the SOA and the STA laws.

KW - Cognition/physiology

KW - Humans

KW - Mathematics

KW - Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology

KW - Perceptual Masking/physiology

KW - Visual Perception/physiology

M3 - Article

C2 - 15270544

VL - 17

SP - 163

EP - 185

JO - Spatial vision

JF - Spatial vision

SN - 0169-1015

IS - 3

ER -

Francis G, Rothmayer M, Hermens F. Analysis and test of laws for backward (metacontrast) masking. Spatial vision. 2004;17(3):163-85.