TY - JOUR
T1 - Analyzing data of a Multilab replication project with individual participant data meta-analysis
T2 - A tutorial
AU - van Aert, Robbie C. M.
N1 - This work was supported by the European Research Council under the grant number: 726361 (IMPROVE).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Multilab replication projects such as Registered Replication Reports (RRR) and Many Labs projects are used to replicate an effect in different tabs. Data of these projects are usually analyzed using conventional meta-analysis methods. This is certainly not the best approach because it does not make optimal use of the available data as a summary rather than participant data are analyzed. I propose to analyze data of multilab replication projects with individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis where the participant data are analyzed directly. The prominent advantages of IPD meta-analysis are that it generally has larger statistical power to detect moderator effects and allows drawing conclusions at the participant and lab level. However, a disadvantage is that IPD meta-analysis is more complex than conventional meta-analysis. In this tutorial, I illustrate IPD meta-analysis using the RRR by McCarthy and colleagues, and 1 provide R code and recommendations to facilitate researchers to apply these methods.
AB - Multilab replication projects such as Registered Replication Reports (RRR) and Many Labs projects are used to replicate an effect in different tabs. Data of these projects are usually analyzed using conventional meta-analysis methods. This is certainly not the best approach because it does not make optimal use of the available data as a summary rather than participant data are analyzed. I propose to analyze data of multilab replication projects with individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis where the participant data are analyzed directly. The prominent advantages of IPD meta-analysis are that it generally has larger statistical power to detect moderator effects and allows drawing conclusions at the participant and lab level. However, a disadvantage is that IPD meta-analysis is more complex than conventional meta-analysis. In this tutorial, I illustrate IPD meta-analysis using the RRR by McCarthy and colleagues, and 1 provide R code and recommendations to facilitate researchers to apply these methods.
KW - meta-analysis
KW - registered replication report
KW - replication
KW - multilevel analysis
KW - individual participant data meta-analysis
UR - https://osf.io/mcvt7/
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124390275&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000483
DO - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000483
M3 - Article
SN - 2151-2604
VL - 230
SP - 60
EP - 72
JO - Zeitschrift für Psychologie
JF - Zeitschrift für Psychologie
IS - 1
ER -