Another failure to replicate Lynn’s estimate of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans

J.M. Wicherts, C.V. Dolan, J.S. Carlson, H.L.J. van der Maas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In his comment on our literature review of data on the performance of sub-Saharan Africans on Raven's Progressive Matrices, Lynn (this issue) criticized our selection of samples of primary and secondary school students. On the basis of the samples he deemed representative, Lynn concluded that the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans stands at 67 when compared to UK norms after a correction of the Flynn Effect. We criticize his methods for being unsystematic. Here we select only those samples that were based on stratified or clustered random sampling and were deemed representative by the original authors. We again fail to replicate Lynn's low estimate of the average IQ of Africans. We argue that these scores are hard to interpret in terms of latent cognitive variables such as g because of the psychometric incomparability we established and because the Flynn Effect has yet to take hold in sub-Saharan Africa.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-157
Number of pages3
JournalLearning and Individual Differences
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Crows
Africa South of the Sahara
psychometrics
primary school
secondary school
performance
student
literature

Cite this

Wicherts, J.M. ; Dolan, C.V. ; Carlson, J.S. ; van der Maas, H.L.J. / Another failure to replicate Lynn’s estimate of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans. In: Learning and Individual Differences. 2010 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 155-157.
@article{e9b0b61d43d64a2faab3a94148c7b31d,
title = "Another failure to replicate Lynn’s estimate of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans",
abstract = "In his comment on our literature review of data on the performance of sub-Saharan Africans on Raven's Progressive Matrices, Lynn (this issue) criticized our selection of samples of primary and secondary school students. On the basis of the samples he deemed representative, Lynn concluded that the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans stands at 67 when compared to UK norms after a correction of the Flynn Effect. We criticize his methods for being unsystematic. Here we select only those samples that were based on stratified or clustered random sampling and were deemed representative by the original authors. We again fail to replicate Lynn's low estimate of the average IQ of Africans. We argue that these scores are hard to interpret in terms of latent cognitive variables such as g because of the psychometric incomparability we established and because the Flynn Effect has yet to take hold in sub-Saharan Africa.",
author = "J.M. Wicherts and C.V. Dolan and J.S. Carlson and {van der Maas}, H.L.J.",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.010",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "155--157",
journal = "Learning and Individual Differences",
issn = "1041-6080",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",
number = "3",

}

Another failure to replicate Lynn’s estimate of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans. / Wicherts, J.M.; Dolan, C.V.; Carlson, J.S.; van der Maas, H.L.J.

In: Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2010, p. 155-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Another failure to replicate Lynn’s estimate of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans

AU - Wicherts, J.M.

AU - Dolan, C.V.

AU - Carlson, J.S.

AU - van der Maas, H.L.J.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - In his comment on our literature review of data on the performance of sub-Saharan Africans on Raven's Progressive Matrices, Lynn (this issue) criticized our selection of samples of primary and secondary school students. On the basis of the samples he deemed representative, Lynn concluded that the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans stands at 67 when compared to UK norms after a correction of the Flynn Effect. We criticize his methods for being unsystematic. Here we select only those samples that were based on stratified or clustered random sampling and were deemed representative by the original authors. We again fail to replicate Lynn's low estimate of the average IQ of Africans. We argue that these scores are hard to interpret in terms of latent cognitive variables such as g because of the psychometric incomparability we established and because the Flynn Effect has yet to take hold in sub-Saharan Africa.

AB - In his comment on our literature review of data on the performance of sub-Saharan Africans on Raven's Progressive Matrices, Lynn (this issue) criticized our selection of samples of primary and secondary school students. On the basis of the samples he deemed representative, Lynn concluded that the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans stands at 67 when compared to UK norms after a correction of the Flynn Effect. We criticize his methods for being unsystematic. Here we select only those samples that were based on stratified or clustered random sampling and were deemed representative by the original authors. We again fail to replicate Lynn's low estimate of the average IQ of Africans. We argue that these scores are hard to interpret in terms of latent cognitive variables such as g because of the psychometric incomparability we established and because the Flynn Effect has yet to take hold in sub-Saharan Africa.

U2 - 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.010

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 155

EP - 157

JO - Learning and Individual Differences

JF - Learning and Individual Differences

SN - 1041-6080

IS - 3

ER -