Another frame, another game? Explaining framing effects in economic games

Philipp Gerlach, B. Jaeger

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Small changes in the framing of games (i.e., the way in which the game situation is described to participants) can have large effects on players' choices. For example, referring to a prisoner's dilemma game as the "Community Game" as opposed to the "Wall Street Game" can double the cooperation rate (Liberman, Samuels, & Ross, 2004). Framing effects are an empirically well-studied phenomenon. However, a coherent theoretical explanation of the observed effects is still lacking. We distinguish between two types of framings - valence framing and context framing - and provide an overview of three general classes of theories that may account for the observed changes in behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of norms, actions, games (NAG 2016)
EditorsA. Hopfensitz, E. Lori
Place of PublicationToulouse: Institute for Advanced Studies
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

economics
prisoner
community

Cite this

Gerlach, P., & Jaeger, B. (2016). Another frame, another game? Explaining framing effects in economic games. In A. Hopfensitz, & E. Lori (Eds.), Proceedings of norms, actions, games (NAG 2016) Toulouse: Institute for Advanced Studies. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AB5YP
Gerlach, Philipp ; Jaeger, B. / Another frame, another game? Explaining framing effects in economic games. Proceedings of norms, actions, games (NAG 2016). editor / A. Hopfensitz ; E. Lori. Toulouse: Institute for Advanced Studies, 2016.
@inproceedings{3fcd76e2a1c646d8a7dee5270c523619,
title = "Another frame, another game?: Explaining framing effects in economic games",
abstract = "Small changes in the framing of games (i.e., the way in which the game situation is described to participants) can have large effects on players' choices. For example, referring to a prisoner's dilemma game as the {"}Community Game{"} as opposed to the {"}Wall Street Game{"} can double the cooperation rate (Liberman, Samuels, & Ross, 2004). Framing effects are an empirically well-studied phenomenon. However, a coherent theoretical explanation of the observed effects is still lacking. We distinguish between two types of framings - valence framing and context framing - and provide an overview of three general classes of theories that may account for the observed changes in behaviour.",
author = "Philipp Gerlach and B. Jaeger",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.17605/OSF.IO/AB5YP",
language = "English",
editor = "A. Hopfensitz and E. Lori",
booktitle = "Proceedings of norms, actions, games (NAG 2016)",

}

Gerlach, P & Jaeger, B 2016, Another frame, another game? Explaining framing effects in economic games. in A Hopfensitz & E Lori (eds), Proceedings of norms, actions, games (NAG 2016). Toulouse: Institute for Advanced Studies. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AB5YP

Another frame, another game? Explaining framing effects in economic games. / Gerlach, Philipp; Jaeger, B.

Proceedings of norms, actions, games (NAG 2016). ed. / A. Hopfensitz; E. Lori. Toulouse: Institute for Advanced Studies, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Another frame, another game?

T2 - Explaining framing effects in economic games

AU - Gerlach, Philipp

AU - Jaeger, B.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Small changes in the framing of games (i.e., the way in which the game situation is described to participants) can have large effects on players' choices. For example, referring to a prisoner's dilemma game as the "Community Game" as opposed to the "Wall Street Game" can double the cooperation rate (Liberman, Samuels, & Ross, 2004). Framing effects are an empirically well-studied phenomenon. However, a coherent theoretical explanation of the observed effects is still lacking. We distinguish between two types of framings - valence framing and context framing - and provide an overview of three general classes of theories that may account for the observed changes in behaviour.

AB - Small changes in the framing of games (i.e., the way in which the game situation is described to participants) can have large effects on players' choices. For example, referring to a prisoner's dilemma game as the "Community Game" as opposed to the "Wall Street Game" can double the cooperation rate (Liberman, Samuels, & Ross, 2004). Framing effects are an empirically well-studied phenomenon. However, a coherent theoretical explanation of the observed effects is still lacking. We distinguish between two types of framings - valence framing and context framing - and provide an overview of three general classes of theories that may account for the observed changes in behaviour.

U2 - 10.17605/OSF.IO/AB5YP

DO - 10.17605/OSF.IO/AB5YP

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Proceedings of norms, actions, games (NAG 2016)

A2 - Hopfensitz, A.

A2 - Lori, E.

CY - Toulouse: Institute for Advanced Studies

ER -

Gerlach P, Jaeger B. Another frame, another game? Explaining framing effects in economic games. In Hopfensitz A, Lori E, editors, Proceedings of norms, actions, games (NAG 2016). Toulouse: Institute for Advanced Studies. 2016 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AB5YP