Appropriate governance responses to infectious disease threats

Developing working hypotheses

Patrick Kenis*, Lianne G. C. Schol, Marleen M. Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Aura Timen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-293
JournalRisk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

Keywords

  • Network Governance
  • Response
  • Outbreak Management
  • Typology of Threats
  • Infectious Disease

Cite this

Kenis, Patrick ; Schol, Lianne G. C. ; Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Marleen M. ; Timen, Aura. / Appropriate governance responses to infectious disease threats : Developing working hypotheses. In: Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 275-293.
@article{97826e9074c34740a32c8142fc2a80e7,
title = "Appropriate governance responses to infectious disease threats: Developing working hypotheses",
abstract = "Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.",
keywords = "Network Governance, Response, Outbreak Management, Typology of Threats, Infectious Disease",
author = "Patrick Kenis and Schol, {Lianne G. C.} and Kraaij-Dirkzwager, {Marleen M.} and Aura Timen",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/rhc3.12176",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "275--293",
journal = "Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy",
issn = "1944-4079",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Appropriate governance responses to infectious disease threats : Developing working hypotheses. / Kenis, Patrick; Schol, Lianne G. C.; Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Marleen M.; Timen, Aura.

In: Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, Vol. 10, No. 3, 09.2019, p. 275-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appropriate governance responses to infectious disease threats

T2 - Developing working hypotheses

AU - Kenis, Patrick

AU - Schol, Lianne G. C.

AU - Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Marleen M.

AU - Timen, Aura

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.

AB - Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.

KW - Network Governance

KW - Response

KW - Outbreak Management

KW - Typology of Threats

KW - Infectious Disease

U2 - 10.1002/rhc3.12176

DO - 10.1002/rhc3.12176

M3 - Review article

VL - 10

SP - 275

EP - 293

JO - Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy

JF - Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy

SN - 1944-4079

IS - 3

ER -