Are Acts of Supererogation Always Praiseworthy?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that praiseworthiness should form part of the analysis of supererogation. I will argue that this view should be rejected. I will start by arguing that, at least on some views of the connection between moral value and praiseworthiness, it does not follow from the fact that acts of supererogation go beyond what is required by duty that they will always be praiseworthy to perform. I will then consider and dismiss what I will call the Argument from Stipulation in favour of holding that acts of supererogation are always praiseworthy. Next, I will examine what I will call the Necessary Connection Argument, which posits a necessary connection between supererogation and praiseworthiness. I will argue that the intuitions used to motivate this argument are best explained by a debunking explanation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-255
Number of pages17
JournalTheoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

Supererogation
Stipulations
Moral Values
Intuition

Cite this

@article{4a9c557211f04c6bb611b308a38c7301,
title = "Are Acts of Supererogation Always Praiseworthy?",
abstract = "It is commonly assumed that praiseworthiness should form part of the analysis of supererogation. I will argue that this view should be rejected. I will start by arguing that, at least on some views of the connection between moral value and praiseworthiness, it does not follow from the fact that acts of supererogation go beyond what is required by duty that they will always be praiseworthy to perform. I will then consider and dismiss what I will call the Argument from Stipulation in favour of holding that acts of supererogation are always praiseworthy. Next, I will examine what I will call the Necessary Connection Argument, which posits a necessary connection between supererogation and praiseworthiness. I will argue that the intuitions used to motivate this argument are best explained by a debunking explanation.",
author = "Alfred Archer",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/theo.12085",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "238--255",
journal = "Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy",
issn = "1755-2567",
number = "3",

}

Are Acts of Supererogation Always Praiseworthy? / Archer, Alfred.

In: Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 82, No. 3, 01.08.2016, p. 238-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Acts of Supererogation Always Praiseworthy?

AU - Archer, Alfred

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - It is commonly assumed that praiseworthiness should form part of the analysis of supererogation. I will argue that this view should be rejected. I will start by arguing that, at least on some views of the connection between moral value and praiseworthiness, it does not follow from the fact that acts of supererogation go beyond what is required by duty that they will always be praiseworthy to perform. I will then consider and dismiss what I will call the Argument from Stipulation in favour of holding that acts of supererogation are always praiseworthy. Next, I will examine what I will call the Necessary Connection Argument, which posits a necessary connection between supererogation and praiseworthiness. I will argue that the intuitions used to motivate this argument are best explained by a debunking explanation.

AB - It is commonly assumed that praiseworthiness should form part of the analysis of supererogation. I will argue that this view should be rejected. I will start by arguing that, at least on some views of the connection between moral value and praiseworthiness, it does not follow from the fact that acts of supererogation go beyond what is required by duty that they will always be praiseworthy to perform. I will then consider and dismiss what I will call the Argument from Stipulation in favour of holding that acts of supererogation are always praiseworthy. Next, I will examine what I will call the Necessary Connection Argument, which posits a necessary connection between supererogation and praiseworthiness. I will argue that the intuitions used to motivate this argument are best explained by a debunking explanation.

U2 - 10.1111/theo.12085

DO - 10.1111/theo.12085

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 238

EP - 255

JO - Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy

JF - Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy

SN - 1755-2567

IS - 3

ER -