@article{9ae89347fa084bfe8930da14945cd7f9,
title = "Are consumption taxes really disliked more than equivalent costs?: Inconclusive results in the USA and no effect in the UK",
abstract = "In two experiments on hypothetical purchase decisions, Sussman and Olivola (2011) found that US citizens prefer avoiding tax-related costs over avoiding tax-unrelated monetary costs of the same size. The original Experiment 1 and 2 tests of this Tax Aversion indicated that people are willing to wait longer to receive a discount when it refers to taxes (e.g., “axe-the-tax discount”) than when it is just a regular discount (e.g., “customer rewards”). We conducted high-powered close replications of both original studies, Experiment 1 (N = 590) and Experiment 2 (N = 650), which reveal either no effect (Experiment 1: r = 0.02, 95% CI [−0.06, 0.10]) or a small effect (Experimental 2: r = 0.09, 95% CI [0.01, 0.16]) in the USA. We also replicated both experimental procedures in the UK to test whether the effect generalized to a value added tax system. Neither Experiment 1 (N = 595; r = 0.01, 95% CI [−0.07, 0.09]) nor Experiment 2 (N = 673; r = 0.03, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.11]) revealed an effect in the UK. Tax Aversion in hypothetical consumption decisions seems to be a smaller phenomenon than originally proposed and does not generalize to a value added tax system.",
keywords = "Financial choice, POLL TAX, POWER, REPLICATION, Replication, Sales tax, Tax aversion, Tax behavior, VAT",
author = "Jerome Olsen and Christoph Kogler and Mark Brandt and Linda Desz{\"o} and Erich Kirchler",
note = "This is called an embargo period and it begins from the date the article is formally published online in its final and fully citable form. Find out more This journal has an embargo period of 24 months.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.joep.2019.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",
issn = "0167-4870",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",
}