Are cross-national surveys the best way to study the extreme-right vote in Europe?

Marc Hooghe*, T. Reeskens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In recent years, various authors have tried to develop a comprehensive explanation for the electoral success of extreme-right parties in Europe. While some authors stress individual-level factors (ethnocentrism, political cynicism, distrust), others stress macro-level variables (party strategy, electoral system). In this field of research cross-national survey data are often used to ascertain the strength of extreme-right parties and the motivation of those who vote for them. Hooghe and Reeskens question the external cross-cultural validity of these measurements, on the grounds of both response. and measurement bias. Using the European Social Survey (29 observations) they find a huge diversity in the external validity of the data, with anything from 15 to 90 per cent of the electoral strength of the extreme-right party being covered in the survey. Using a multiple regression model, they identify survey response rate, voter turnout and the populist appeal of the party itself as possible causes for this selective under-representation. The only possible conclusion is that cross-national surveys do not succeed in establishing cross-cultural external validity for questions of extreme-right voting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-196
JournalPatterns of prejudice
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cross-cultural validity
  • European Social Survey
  • extreme-right parties
  • survey research
  • voting behaviour
  • ANTI-IMMIGRANT PARTIES
  • WESTERN-EUROPE
  • SOCIAL DESIRABILITY
  • PROTEST

Cite this

@article{6131fcdcf7e544a9b93282bf52b1b84b,
title = "Are cross-national surveys the best way to study the extreme-right vote in Europe?",
abstract = "In recent years, various authors have tried to develop a comprehensive explanation for the electoral success of extreme-right parties in Europe. While some authors stress individual-level factors (ethnocentrism, political cynicism, distrust), others stress macro-level variables (party strategy, electoral system). In this field of research cross-national survey data are often used to ascertain the strength of extreme-right parties and the motivation of those who vote for them. Hooghe and Reeskens question the external cross-cultural validity of these measurements, on the grounds of both response. and measurement bias. Using the European Social Survey (29 observations) they find a huge diversity in the external validity of the data, with anything from 15 to 90 per cent of the electoral strength of the extreme-right party being covered in the survey. Using a multiple regression model, they identify survey response rate, voter turnout and the populist appeal of the party itself as possible causes for this selective under-representation. The only possible conclusion is that cross-national surveys do not succeed in establishing cross-cultural external validity for questions of extreme-right voting.",
keywords = "cross-cultural validity, European Social Survey, extreme-right parties, survey research, voting behaviour, ANTI-IMMIGRANT PARTIES, WESTERN-EUROPE, SOCIAL DESIRABILITY, PROTEST",
author = "Marc Hooghe and T. Reeskens",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/00313220701265544",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "177--196",
journal = "Patterns of prejudice",
issn = "0031-322X",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "2",

}

Are cross-national surveys the best way to study the extreme-right vote in Europe? / Hooghe, Marc; Reeskens, T.

In: Patterns of prejudice, Vol. 41, No. 2, 05.2007, p. 177-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are cross-national surveys the best way to study the extreme-right vote in Europe?

AU - Hooghe, Marc

AU - Reeskens, T.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - In recent years, various authors have tried to develop a comprehensive explanation for the electoral success of extreme-right parties in Europe. While some authors stress individual-level factors (ethnocentrism, political cynicism, distrust), others stress macro-level variables (party strategy, electoral system). In this field of research cross-national survey data are often used to ascertain the strength of extreme-right parties and the motivation of those who vote for them. Hooghe and Reeskens question the external cross-cultural validity of these measurements, on the grounds of both response. and measurement bias. Using the European Social Survey (29 observations) they find a huge diversity in the external validity of the data, with anything from 15 to 90 per cent of the electoral strength of the extreme-right party being covered in the survey. Using a multiple regression model, they identify survey response rate, voter turnout and the populist appeal of the party itself as possible causes for this selective under-representation. The only possible conclusion is that cross-national surveys do not succeed in establishing cross-cultural external validity for questions of extreme-right voting.

AB - In recent years, various authors have tried to develop a comprehensive explanation for the electoral success of extreme-right parties in Europe. While some authors stress individual-level factors (ethnocentrism, political cynicism, distrust), others stress macro-level variables (party strategy, electoral system). In this field of research cross-national survey data are often used to ascertain the strength of extreme-right parties and the motivation of those who vote for them. Hooghe and Reeskens question the external cross-cultural validity of these measurements, on the grounds of both response. and measurement bias. Using the European Social Survey (29 observations) they find a huge diversity in the external validity of the data, with anything from 15 to 90 per cent of the electoral strength of the extreme-right party being covered in the survey. Using a multiple regression model, they identify survey response rate, voter turnout and the populist appeal of the party itself as possible causes for this selective under-representation. The only possible conclusion is that cross-national surveys do not succeed in establishing cross-cultural external validity for questions of extreme-right voting.

KW - cross-cultural validity

KW - European Social Survey

KW - extreme-right parties

KW - survey research

KW - voting behaviour

KW - ANTI-IMMIGRANT PARTIES

KW - WESTERN-EUROPE

KW - SOCIAL DESIRABILITY

KW - PROTEST

U2 - 10.1080/00313220701265544

DO - 10.1080/00313220701265544

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 177

EP - 196

JO - Patterns of prejudice

JF - Patterns of prejudice

SN - 0031-322X

IS - 2

ER -