Are the unemployed equally unhappy all around the world? The role of the social norms to work and welfare state provision in 28 OECD countries

Olga Stavrova*, Thomas Schloesser, Detlef Fetchenhauer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines cross-national and temporal variations in the effect of personal unemployment on life satisfaction. To account for these variations we consider the social norm to work and national systems of unemployment benefits. Following the social psychological approach to social norms (Cialdini, Reno, & Kallgren, 1990) we differentiate between descriptive, societal injunctive and personal injunctive norms. We use the national unemployment rates as a proxy of the descriptive norm to work. The societal injunctive norm and the personal injunctive norm to work are conceptualized as society's vs. personal attitudes towards working for a living versus living off public funds, respectively.

The results of the multilevel regression analysis of the data from 28 OECD countries (European and World Values Survey, 1999-2009) suggest that the single country characteristic that could explain contextual variations in the unemployment effect is the societal injunctive norm to work: unemployment hurts less in societies with more tolerant attitudes towards being out of work. This effect holds even after controlling for the national level of unemployment benefits and the personal injunctive norm to work. We conclude that the negative effect of personal unemployment in societies with a strong societal injunctive norm to work is so much higher due to social pressure and disapproval and not to the perception that one does not live up to their own standards. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-171
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Descriptive norms
  • Injunctive norms
  • Unemployment
  • Survey
  • Life satisfaction
  • Conformity
  • Welfare state
  • LIFE SATISFACTION
  • MENTAL-HEALTH
  • SELF-ESTEEM
  • PANEL-DATA
  • HAPPINESS
  • EMPLOYMENT
  • SYMPTOMS
  • BEHAVIOR
  • GERMANY
  • CONTEXT

Cite this

@article{706f7c44c18f40a591418cb4a1ae35de,
title = "Are the unemployed equally unhappy all around the world? The role of the social norms to work and welfare state provision in 28 OECD countries",
abstract = "This paper examines cross-national and temporal variations in the effect of personal unemployment on life satisfaction. To account for these variations we consider the social norm to work and national systems of unemployment benefits. Following the social psychological approach to social norms (Cialdini, Reno, & Kallgren, 1990) we differentiate between descriptive, societal injunctive and personal injunctive norms. We use the national unemployment rates as a proxy of the descriptive norm to work. The societal injunctive norm and the personal injunctive norm to work are conceptualized as society's vs. personal attitudes towards working for a living versus living off public funds, respectively.The results of the multilevel regression analysis of the data from 28 OECD countries (European and World Values Survey, 1999-2009) suggest that the single country characteristic that could explain contextual variations in the unemployment effect is the societal injunctive norm to work: unemployment hurts less in societies with more tolerant attitudes towards being out of work. This effect holds even after controlling for the national level of unemployment benefits and the personal injunctive norm to work. We conclude that the negative effect of personal unemployment in societies with a strong societal injunctive norm to work is so much higher due to social pressure and disapproval and not to the perception that one does not live up to their own standards. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Descriptive norms, Injunctive norms, Unemployment, Survey, Life satisfaction, Conformity, Welfare state, LIFE SATISFACTION, MENTAL-HEALTH, SELF-ESTEEM, PANEL-DATA, HAPPINESS, EMPLOYMENT, SYMPTOMS, BEHAVIOR, GERMANY, CONTEXT",
author = "Olga Stavrova and Thomas Schloesser and Detlef Fetchenhauer",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "159--171",
journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",
issn = "0167-4870",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",
number = "1",

}

Are the unemployed equally unhappy all around the world? The role of the social norms to work and welfare state provision in 28 OECD countries. / Stavrova, Olga; Schloesser, Thomas; Fetchenhauer, Detlef.

In: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 1, 02.2011, p. 159-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are the unemployed equally unhappy all around the world? The role of the social norms to work and welfare state provision in 28 OECD countries

AU - Stavrova, Olga

AU - Schloesser, Thomas

AU - Fetchenhauer, Detlef

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - This paper examines cross-national and temporal variations in the effect of personal unemployment on life satisfaction. To account for these variations we consider the social norm to work and national systems of unemployment benefits. Following the social psychological approach to social norms (Cialdini, Reno, & Kallgren, 1990) we differentiate between descriptive, societal injunctive and personal injunctive norms. We use the national unemployment rates as a proxy of the descriptive norm to work. The societal injunctive norm and the personal injunctive norm to work are conceptualized as society's vs. personal attitudes towards working for a living versus living off public funds, respectively.The results of the multilevel regression analysis of the data from 28 OECD countries (European and World Values Survey, 1999-2009) suggest that the single country characteristic that could explain contextual variations in the unemployment effect is the societal injunctive norm to work: unemployment hurts less in societies with more tolerant attitudes towards being out of work. This effect holds even after controlling for the national level of unemployment benefits and the personal injunctive norm to work. We conclude that the negative effect of personal unemployment in societies with a strong societal injunctive norm to work is so much higher due to social pressure and disapproval and not to the perception that one does not live up to their own standards. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - This paper examines cross-national and temporal variations in the effect of personal unemployment on life satisfaction. To account for these variations we consider the social norm to work and national systems of unemployment benefits. Following the social psychological approach to social norms (Cialdini, Reno, & Kallgren, 1990) we differentiate between descriptive, societal injunctive and personal injunctive norms. We use the national unemployment rates as a proxy of the descriptive norm to work. The societal injunctive norm and the personal injunctive norm to work are conceptualized as society's vs. personal attitudes towards working for a living versus living off public funds, respectively.The results of the multilevel regression analysis of the data from 28 OECD countries (European and World Values Survey, 1999-2009) suggest that the single country characteristic that could explain contextual variations in the unemployment effect is the societal injunctive norm to work: unemployment hurts less in societies with more tolerant attitudes towards being out of work. This effect holds even after controlling for the national level of unemployment benefits and the personal injunctive norm to work. We conclude that the negative effect of personal unemployment in societies with a strong societal injunctive norm to work is so much higher due to social pressure and disapproval and not to the perception that one does not live up to their own standards. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - Descriptive norms

KW - Injunctive norms

KW - Unemployment

KW - Survey

KW - Life satisfaction

KW - Conformity

KW - Welfare state

KW - LIFE SATISFACTION

KW - MENTAL-HEALTH

KW - SELF-ESTEEM

KW - PANEL-DATA

KW - HAPPINESS

KW - EMPLOYMENT

KW - SYMPTOMS

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - GERMANY

KW - CONTEXT

U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.002

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 159

EP - 171

JO - Journal of Economic Psychology

JF - Journal of Economic Psychology

SN - 0167-4870

IS - 1

ER -