Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making

C. Toma, D. Vasiljevic, D. Oberlé, F. Butera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Expertise assignment has been proposed to improve unshared information pooling in group decision making. The current research revises this view by hypothesizing that expertise assignment is beneficial when group members have cooperative goals, but is detrimental when group members have competitive goals. Three-person groups were confronted with a hidden-profile task. Members were either assigned experts or not and were instructed to either cooperate or compete with other members. The results confirmed that expertise decreased unshared information pooling and repetitions in competition, while the reverse was found in cooperation. This interaction effect was mediated by self–other difference in perceived competence. Thus, expertise favours or hinders information sharing in group decision making as a function of members’ cooperative or competitive goals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-172
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Information Dissemination
Mental Competency

Cite this

Toma, C. ; Vasiljevic, D. ; Oberlé, D. ; Butera, F. / Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making. In: British Journal of Social Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 52, No. 1. pp. 161-172.
@article{20220c2d336b408a82783cc7aea22e4e,
title = "Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making",
abstract = "Expertise assignment has been proposed to improve unshared information pooling in group decision making. The current research revises this view by hypothesizing that expertise assignment is beneficial when group members have cooperative goals, but is detrimental when group members have competitive goals. Three-person groups were confronted with a hidden-profile task. Members were either assigned experts or not and were instructed to either cooperate or compete with other members. The results confirmed that expertise decreased unshared information pooling and repetitions in competition, while the reverse was found in cooperation. This interaction effect was mediated by self–other difference in perceived competence. Thus, expertise favours or hinders information sharing in group decision making as a function of members’ cooperative or competitive goals.",
author = "C. Toma and D. Vasiljevic and D. Oberl{\'e} and F. Butera",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "161--172",
journal = "British Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0144-6665",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making. / Toma, C.; Vasiljevic, D.; Oberlé, D.; Butera, F.

In: British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2013, p. 161-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making

AU - Toma, C.

AU - Vasiljevic, D.

AU - Oberlé, D.

AU - Butera, F.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Expertise assignment has been proposed to improve unshared information pooling in group decision making. The current research revises this view by hypothesizing that expertise assignment is beneficial when group members have cooperative goals, but is detrimental when group members have competitive goals. Three-person groups were confronted with a hidden-profile task. Members were either assigned experts or not and were instructed to either cooperate or compete with other members. The results confirmed that expertise decreased unshared information pooling and repetitions in competition, while the reverse was found in cooperation. This interaction effect was mediated by self–other difference in perceived competence. Thus, expertise favours or hinders information sharing in group decision making as a function of members’ cooperative or competitive goals.

AB - Expertise assignment has been proposed to improve unshared information pooling in group decision making. The current research revises this view by hypothesizing that expertise assignment is beneficial when group members have cooperative goals, but is detrimental when group members have competitive goals. Three-person groups were confronted with a hidden-profile task. Members were either assigned experts or not and were instructed to either cooperate or compete with other members. The results confirmed that expertise decreased unshared information pooling and repetitions in competition, while the reverse was found in cooperation. This interaction effect was mediated by self–other difference in perceived competence. Thus, expertise favours or hinders information sharing in group decision making as a function of members’ cooperative or competitive goals.

U2 - 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 161

EP - 172

JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0144-6665

IS - 1

ER -