TY - JOUR
T1 - Attachment categories or dimensions
T2 - The Adult Attachment Scale across three generations in Poland
AU - Lubiewska, Katarzyna
AU - Van De Vijver, Fons J. R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the German Research Foundation under Grants TR 169/9-1, -2, -3 and NA 164/9-1, -3, -4; and the Polish Research Committee under Grant 1 H01F 070 29. The study is part of the cross-cultural and interdisciplinary research project ?Value of Children and Intergenerational Relations.? Principal investigators: Gisela Trommsdorff, University of Konstanz, and Bernhard Nauck, Chemnitz University of Technology.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Even though previous attachment taxometric studies supported the conclusion that attachment is rather dimensional than categorical construct, they also did not provide consistent support against categorical approach. Addressing limitations of previous taxometric studies on adult attachment, we asked two research questions: Is attachment as measured by the Adult Attachment Scale (AAS) categorical or dimensional? What is the predictive validity of categorical and dimensional approaches? To answer these questions, data of the AAS from 869 parents, 575 adolescents, and 500 grandmothers from the same families in Poland were analyzed. Taxometric analyses were replicated across three generations providing weak evidences to support the dimensional approach. Clustering methods provided an additional support revealing that empirically derived categories of attachment are based on security level but not on qualitatively different attachment patterns. Analyses testing predictive effects of categorical compared to dimensional approaches to attachment assessment revealed that a dimensional approach is more valid than a categorical approach in testing hypotheses related to the intergenerational transmission of attachment.
AB - Even though previous attachment taxometric studies supported the conclusion that attachment is rather dimensional than categorical construct, they also did not provide consistent support against categorical approach. Addressing limitations of previous taxometric studies on adult attachment, we asked two research questions: Is attachment as measured by the Adult Attachment Scale (AAS) categorical or dimensional? What is the predictive validity of categorical and dimensional approaches? To answer these questions, data of the AAS from 869 parents, 575 adolescents, and 500 grandmothers from the same families in Poland were analyzed. Taxometric analyses were replicated across three generations providing weak evidences to support the dimensional approach. Clustering methods provided an additional support revealing that empirically derived categories of attachment are based on security level but not on qualitatively different attachment patterns. Analyses testing predictive effects of categorical compared to dimensional approaches to attachment assessment revealed that a dimensional approach is more valid than a categorical approach in testing hypotheses related to the intergenerational transmission of attachment.
KW - Attachment
KW - developmental psychology
KW - families
KW - intergenerational transmission of attachment
KW - psychometric measurement/psychological assessment
KW - taxometric methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068846927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0265407519860594
DO - 10.1177/0265407519860594
M3 - Article
SN - 0265-4075
VL - 37
SP - 233
EP - 259
JO - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
JF - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
IS - 1
M1 - 0265407519860594
ER -