Attitude moralization

Probably not intuitive or rooted in perceptions of harm

L.J. Skitka, D.C. Wisneski, M.J. Brandt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

People vary in the extent to which they imbue attitudes with moral conviction, and this variation is consequential. Yet we know relatively little about what makes people’s feelings about a given attitude object transform from a relatively non moral preference to a moral conviction. In this article, we review evidence from two experiments and a field study that sheds some light on the processes that lead to attitude moralization. This research explored the roles of incidental and integral affect, cognitive factors such as recognition of harm, and whether attitude-moralization processes can occur outside conscious awareness or require some level of conscious deliberation. The findings present some challenges to contemporary theories that emphasize the roles of intuition and harm and indicate that more research designed to better understand moralization processes is needed.
Keywords: morality, emotion, intuition, harm, moral conviction, dyadic morality, social intuitionism
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-13
JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Intuition
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • CONVICTION
  • DISGUST
  • MIND
  • MORAL JUDGMENT
  • dyadic morality
  • emotion
  • harm
  • intuition
  • moral conviction
  • morality
  • social intuitionism

Cite this

@article{f96b896c6d0d43c3a9a28e42315445d9,
title = "Attitude moralization: Probably not intuitive or rooted in perceptions of harm",
abstract = "People vary in the extent to which they imbue attitudes with moral conviction, and this variation is consequential. Yet we know relatively little about what makes people’s feelings about a given attitude object transform from a relatively non moral preference to a moral conviction. In this article, we review evidence from two experiments and a field study that sheds some light on the processes that lead to attitude moralization. This research explored the roles of incidental and integral affect, cognitive factors such as recognition of harm, and whether attitude-moralization processes can occur outside conscious awareness or require some level of conscious deliberation. The findings present some challenges to contemporary theories that emphasize the roles of intuition and harm and indicate that more research designed to better understand moralization processes is needed.Keywords: morality, emotion, intuition, harm, moral conviction, dyadic morality, social intuitionism",
keywords = "CONVICTION, DISGUST, MIND, MORAL JUDGMENT, dyadic morality, emotion, harm, intuition, moral conviction, morality, social intuitionism",
author = "L.J. Skitka and D.C. Wisneski and M.J. Brandt",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/0963721417727861",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "9--13",
journal = "Current Directions in Psychological Science",
issn = "0963-7214",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Attitude moralization : Probably not intuitive or rooted in perceptions of harm. / Skitka, L.J.; Wisneski, D.C.; Brandt, M.J.

In: Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2018, p. 9-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitude moralization

T2 - Probably not intuitive or rooted in perceptions of harm

AU - Skitka, L.J.

AU - Wisneski, D.C.

AU - Brandt, M.J.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - People vary in the extent to which they imbue attitudes with moral conviction, and this variation is consequential. Yet we know relatively little about what makes people’s feelings about a given attitude object transform from a relatively non moral preference to a moral conviction. In this article, we review evidence from two experiments and a field study that sheds some light on the processes that lead to attitude moralization. This research explored the roles of incidental and integral affect, cognitive factors such as recognition of harm, and whether attitude-moralization processes can occur outside conscious awareness or require some level of conscious deliberation. The findings present some challenges to contemporary theories that emphasize the roles of intuition and harm and indicate that more research designed to better understand moralization processes is needed.Keywords: morality, emotion, intuition, harm, moral conviction, dyadic morality, social intuitionism

AB - People vary in the extent to which they imbue attitudes with moral conviction, and this variation is consequential. Yet we know relatively little about what makes people’s feelings about a given attitude object transform from a relatively non moral preference to a moral conviction. In this article, we review evidence from two experiments and a field study that sheds some light on the processes that lead to attitude moralization. This research explored the roles of incidental and integral affect, cognitive factors such as recognition of harm, and whether attitude-moralization processes can occur outside conscious awareness or require some level of conscious deliberation. The findings present some challenges to contemporary theories that emphasize the roles of intuition and harm and indicate that more research designed to better understand moralization processes is needed.Keywords: morality, emotion, intuition, harm, moral conviction, dyadic morality, social intuitionism

KW - CONVICTION

KW - DISGUST

KW - MIND

KW - MORAL JUDGMENT

KW - dyadic morality

KW - emotion

KW - harm

KW - intuition

KW - moral conviction

KW - morality

KW - social intuitionism

U2 - 10.1177/0963721417727861

DO - 10.1177/0963721417727861

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 9

EP - 13

JO - Current Directions in Psychological Science

JF - Current Directions in Psychological Science

SN - 0963-7214

IS - 1

ER -