Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy

Knowledge versatility for public policy

Farhad Mukhtarov, Andrea Gerlak, Robin Pierce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In the face of energy security and climate change, and with technological advances, many industrial countries have embraced the transition to a bioeconomy – an economy based on energy, chemicals and materials obtained from biomass. However, the policy and academic discourses on a bioeconomy transition suggest growing controversy around its social, environmental and ethical impacts. In this article, we apply an epistemic forms framework to better understand the scope and extent of the bioeconomy debate. We find that industry and governments take a narrow approach to a bioeconomy and tend to view it exclusively as a technical concept. We argue that the discursive and practical dimensions of the transition would shed light on the issues of what type of a bioeconomy to strive for, through which procedures and with what impacts for diverse stakeholders. We conclude with a set of recommendations related to a bioeconomy transition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1010-1028
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironment and Planning C
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Oct 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

fossil fuel
public policy
energy
stakeholder
climate change
economy
industry
discourse
biomass
public
policy
recommendation
material
chemical

Cite this

@article{543d6b4469cf46b2bc7b2fc0fa0bfdef,
title = "Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy",
abstract = "In the face of energy security and climate change, and with technological advances, many industrial countries have embraced the transition to a bioeconomy – an economy based on energy, chemicals and materials obtained from biomass. However, the policy and academic discourses on a bioeconomy transition suggest growing controversy around its social, environmental and ethical impacts. In this article, we apply an epistemic forms framework to better understand the scope and extent of the bioeconomy debate. We find that industry and governments take a narrow approach to a bioeconomy and tend to view it exclusively as a technical concept. We argue that the discursive and practical dimensions of the transition would shed light on the issues of what type of a bioeconomy to strive for, through which procedures and with what impacts for diverse stakeholders. We conclude with a set of recommendations related to a bioeconomy transition.",
author = "Farhad Mukhtarov and Andrea Gerlak and Robin Pierce",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16676273",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1010--1028",
journal = "Environment and Planning C",
issn = "2399-6544",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy : Knowledge versatility for public policy. / Mukhtarov, Farhad; Gerlak, Andrea; Pierce, Robin.

In: Environment and Planning C, Vol. 35, No. 6, 28.10.2016, p. 1010-1028.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy

T2 - Knowledge versatility for public policy

AU - Mukhtarov, Farhad

AU - Gerlak, Andrea

AU - Pierce, Robin

PY - 2016/10/28

Y1 - 2016/10/28

N2 - In the face of energy security and climate change, and with technological advances, many industrial countries have embraced the transition to a bioeconomy – an economy based on energy, chemicals and materials obtained from biomass. However, the policy and academic discourses on a bioeconomy transition suggest growing controversy around its social, environmental and ethical impacts. In this article, we apply an epistemic forms framework to better understand the scope and extent of the bioeconomy debate. We find that industry and governments take a narrow approach to a bioeconomy and tend to view it exclusively as a technical concept. We argue that the discursive and practical dimensions of the transition would shed light on the issues of what type of a bioeconomy to strive for, through which procedures and with what impacts for diverse stakeholders. We conclude with a set of recommendations related to a bioeconomy transition.

AB - In the face of energy security and climate change, and with technological advances, many industrial countries have embraced the transition to a bioeconomy – an economy based on energy, chemicals and materials obtained from biomass. However, the policy and academic discourses on a bioeconomy transition suggest growing controversy around its social, environmental and ethical impacts. In this article, we apply an epistemic forms framework to better understand the scope and extent of the bioeconomy debate. We find that industry and governments take a narrow approach to a bioeconomy and tend to view it exclusively as a technical concept. We argue that the discursive and practical dimensions of the transition would shed light on the issues of what type of a bioeconomy to strive for, through which procedures and with what impacts for diverse stakeholders. We conclude with a set of recommendations related to a bioeconomy transition.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16676273

DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16676273

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1010

EP - 1028

JO - Environment and Planning C

JF - Environment and Planning C

SN - 2399-6544

IS - 6

ER -