Backchannel behavior is idiosyncratic

Pieter A. Blomsma*, Julija Vaitonyte, Gabriel Skantze, Marc Swerts

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In spoken conversations, speakers and their addressees constantly seek and provide different forms of audiovisual feedback, also known as backchannels, which include nodding, vocaliza- tions and facial expressions. It has previously been shown that addressees backchannel at specific points during an interaction, namely after a speaker provided a cue to elicit feedback from the addressee. However, addressees may differ in the frequency and type of feedback that they provide, and likewise, speakers may vary the type of cues they generate to signal the backchannel opportunity points (BOPs). Research on the extent to which backchanneling is idiosyncratic is scant. In this article, we quantify and analyze the variability in feedback behavior of 14 addressees who all interacted with the same speaker stimulus. We conducted this research by means of a previously developed experimental paradigm that generates spontaneous interactions in a controlled manner. Our results show that (1) backchanneling behavior varies between listeners (some addressees are more active than others) and (2) backchanneling behavior varies between BOPs (some points trigger more responses than others). We discuss the relevance of these results for models of human–human and human–machine interactions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1158-1181
Number of pages24
JournalLanguage and Cognition
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • backchannels
  • consensus sampling
  • head nod
  • listener feedback
  • multimodal
  • O-Cam paradigm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Backchannel behavior is idiosyncratic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this